Table 2

PrEP uptake

Study IDUptakeDefinition of uptakeFactors associated with (or reasons for) PrEP uptake
Facility-based models
Hensen et al 19 33.6%Ever used/totalFSWs with a high number (10+) of clients (aOR 1.71; 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.76), duration of sex work (<2 years, aOR 0.51; 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.83), having visited a sex worker programme in 12 months (aOR 2.92; 95% CI: 1.91 to 4.46) and ever been offered PrEP were more likely to initiate PrEP.
Cowan et al 20 38.4%Enrolled/eligibleNR
Franks (2021)NREnrolled/eligibleDecliners were not interested in daily medication and did not believe they needed PrEP*.
Leis et al 22 60.9%Current or past user/totalCurrent PrEP users who experienced emotional violence (aOR 0.23; 95% CI:0.07 to 0.71) had a decline in PrEP use, while those who experienced physical violence (aOR 3.01; 95% CI: 1.16 to 7.81) increased their PrEP use.
Pillay et al 23 66.3%Current or past users/those who have heard of PrEPReasons for accepting PrEP included being sexually active (34.5%), perceived risk of HIV (25.7%) and had multiple sex partners (23.9%), whereas for decliners failed side effects (41.9%), stigma (12.9%) and daily adherence (12.9%).
Jana et al 24 80.4%Enrolled/eligibleDecliners found daily PrEP inconvenient (14%) and feared side effects (43%), while others gave no reason (14%) or did not identify as FSW (29%).
Sarr et al 25 82.4%Enrolled/eligibleUnregistered FSWs (RR 1.16; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.26) more likely to initiate.
Kagaayi et al 26 82.8%Enrolled/eligibleNR
Mboup et al 27 88.3%Enrolled/eligibleDecliners did not want to take daily pills (4/34), wanted to think more about PrEP (4/34), do not perceive self as at risk (9/34), were afraid of side effects (9/34) and were going out of town (8/34).
Eakle et al 28 97.8%NRNR
Community-based models
Guure et al 29 6.4%Ever used/those who have heard of PrEPFSWs who were willing to use PrEP had higher odds of ever taking compared with FSWs not willing to take PrEP (OR 43; CI: 2.93 to 150); FSWs who had screened for STIs had higher odds of taking PrEP than those who had never screened (OR 5.2; CI: 1.68 to 11.36).
Matambanadzo et al 30 33.7%Enrolled/eligibleNR
Witte et al 31 55.2%Enrolled/eligible, not on PrEP alreadyFSWs with greater social support (aOR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.66) were less likely to initiate, while those with high family stigma related to sex work (aOR 2.2; 95% CI: 1.15 to 4.22) were more likely to initiate PrEP. Decliners expressed inability to adhere to daily medication (16.4%), concerns about side effects (5%) and fear of stigma associated with HIV-positive status (3.8%).
Reza-Paul et al 32 99.2%Enrolled/eligibleNR
  • *Results not disaggregated for FSWs.

  • aOR, adjusted OR; FSWs, female sex workers; NR, not reported; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis; RR, relative risk; STIs, sexually transmitted infections.