Table 2

Logistic regression analyses of the associations between the intervention group (vs the control group) and unintended outcomes measured at 5 months follow-up among daily smokers at baseline, using multiple imputation of missing data (N=40×491)

Unintended outcome at follow-upIntervention group (n=40×264)Control group (n=40×227)Adjusted*
%%OR95% CI
Alternative tobacco and nicotine product use
 Regular smokeless tobacco use22.428.80.780.40 to 1.54
 Regular hookah use23.222.41.280.61 to 2.67
 Regular e-cigarette use37.234.11.170.65 to 2.10
 Regular use of either smokeless tobacco, hookah or e-cigarettes56.157.21.100.64 to 1.88
Regular cannabis use11.07.21.680.67 to 4.20
Well-being
 Boredom in breaks during school hours22.632.20.590.32 to 1.10
 Loneliness during school hours18.116.81.150.53 to 2.50
 High level of stress66.675.10.620.35 to 1.10
Stigmatisation
 Self-stigma33.635.20.970.54 to 1.75
 Felt stigma12.09.51.550.71 to 3.40
 Discrimination1.81.9
  • Due to low student representation in the discrimination subscale, regression analyses were not possible.

  • *Adjusted for gender, socioeconomic status, age and baseline variable if available (regular smokeless tobacco, hookah and e-cigarette use).