Table 2

Research objectives and methods of assessment to investigate the feasibility of the personalised prehabilitation programme in clinical practice

Research objectiveMethod of assessment(s)
To estimate eligibility, recruitment, refusal and attrition rates (including the reasons why)Descriptive statistics—number approached, eligible, recruited, refused and number who drop out and at what stage
Field notes taken during the Lung Cancer Multi-Disciplinary Team
Participant discussion
To assess adherence to the personalised prehabilitation interventionsWeekly telephone call—adherence to goals set
To assess the barriers and facilitators to adherence and intervention fidelityDaily diary—symptom log
Weekly telephone call
Short free text questionnaire at the end of the study, analysed thematically
To evaluate acceptability of the study processes and outcome measuresCompletion rates
Weekly telephone call
Short free text questionnaire at the end of the study, analysed thematically
To determine the ‘prehabilitation window’ (length of time between diagnosis and the start of treatment)Descriptive statistics—date of diagnosis, date of start of treatment, date of start and finish of prehabilitation
To determine the extent to which the intervention/s are likely to have an impact on psychological well-being, nutrition and/or physical activity and quality of lifeQuestionnaires—change between baseline and follow-up
Daily diary—symptom log
Weekly telephone call
Short free text questionnaire at the end of the study, analysed thematically
Functional objective assessments
To determine the number of participants who require universal, targeted and specialist interventionQuestionnaires—level of need and readiness
Descriptive statistics