Table 2

Reporting practices for the Abstract

Per cent agreement*All journals
N=127
Medical journals n=68Psychiatric journals n=59P value†
One hypothesis clearly stated58%93 (73%; 65% to 80%)61 (90%; 80% to 95%)32 (54%; 42% to 66%)<0.001*
Statistical measures included
Any statistical measures94%123 (97%; 92% to 99%)68 (100%; 95% to 100%)55 (93%; 84% to 97%)0.04
Sample size88%123 (97%; 92% to 99%)68 (100%; 95% to 100%)55 (93%; 84% to 97%)0.04
Statistical significance93%124 (98%; 93% to 99%)66 (97%; 90% to 99%)58 (98%; 91% to 100%)1.0
P values92%101 (80%; 72% to 86%)61 (90%; 80% to 95%)40 (68%; 55% to 78%)0.004
CIs92%97 (76%; 68% to 83%)63 (93%; 84% to 97%)34 (58%; 45% to 69%)<0.001*
Effect sizes76%117 (92%; 86% to 96%)67 (99%; 92% to 100%)50 (85%; 73% to 92%)0.006
Multiple testing correction94%5 (4%; 2% to 9%)2 (3%; 1% to 10%)3 (5%; 2% to 14%)0.66
Other statistical measure(s)82%22 (17%; 12% to 25%)11 (16%; 9% to 27%)11 (19%; 11% to 30%)0.82
  • *In cases of disagreement between reviewers, the item was considered included if either reviewer reported it was included. If one reviewer did not enter a response, the presence of the item was based on the other reviewer’s response. For calculation of agreement, a missed response by one of two reviewers was considered an instance of disagreement. No more than two ratings were missing per item unless indicated.

  • †Testwise p value from Fisher’s exact test. *P<0.05 after Hommel multiple testing correction, corrected p<0.004.