Table 4

Clinical performance and cost analysis of different screening strategies for CIN2+ and CIN3+ diagnoses after 3 years follow-up after adjustment

Adjusted 1Adjusted 2
Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)PPV (%)NPV (%)Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)PPV (%)NPV (%)
≥CIN2
 Strategy 188.7
(80.1 to 97.2)
86.8
(85.6 to 88.0)
10.2
(9.0 to 11.4)
99.8
(99.5 to 99.9)
96.2
(91.1 to 100)
86.9
(85.8 to 88.1)
11.0
(10.0 to 12.1)
99.9
(99.7 to 99.9)
 Strategy 246.2
(32.6 to 59.7)
90.1
(89.3 to 91.4)
7.3
(5.5 to 9.7)
99.0
(98.8 to 99.2)
50.0
(36.4 to 63.4)
90.4
(89.4 to 91.5)
7.9
(6.0 to 10.3)
99.1
(98.8 to 99.3)
 Strategy 392.3
(85.1 to 99.6)
79.8
(78.4 to 81.2)
7.0
(6.3 to 7.7)
99.8
(99.6 to 99.9)
98.1
(94.3 to 100.0)
79.9
(78.5 to 81.3)
7.4
(6.9 to 8.0)
99.9
(99.7 to 99.9)
≥CIN3
 Strategy 193.5
(84.9 to 100.0)
86.3
(85.1 to 87.5)
6.3
(5.6 to 7.1)
99.9
(99.7 to 100.0)
100.0
(100.0 to 100.0)
86.4
(85.2 to 87.6)
6.7
(6.2 to 7.3)
100.0
(100.0 to 100.0)
 Strategy 254.8
(37.3 to 72.4)
90.2
(89.2 to 91.2)
5.2
(3.8 to 7.1)
99.5
(99.3 to 99.7)
58.1
(40.7 to 75.4)
90.2
(89.2 to 91.3)
5.5
(4.1 to 7.4)
99.5
(99.3 to 99.7)
 Strategy 393.5
(84.9 to 100.0)
79.3
(77.9 to 80.7)
4.2
(3.8 to 4.7)
99.9
(99.7 to 100.0)
100.0
(100.0 to 100.0)
79.4
(78.0 to 80.8)
4.5
(4.2 to 4.8)
100.0
(100.0 to 100.0)
  • Adjusted 1: all cases found by other strategies were considered as missed cases. Adjusted 2: all cases found by other strategies were considered as detected cases.

  • CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.