Table 3

Clinical performance and cost analysis of different screening strategies for CIN2+ and CIN3+ diagnoses after 3 years follow-up

Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)PPV (%)NPV (%)Colposcopy referral rate (%)NNR*
≥CIN2
 Strategy 195.9
(90.1 to 100.0)
86.8
(85.7 to 88.0)
10.2
(9.2 to 11.2)
99.9
(99.7 to 100.0)
7.8
(6.8 to 8.7)
9.8
(8.9 to 10.9)
 Strategy 248.0
(34.2 to 61.8)
90.4
(89.3 to 91.4)
7.3
(5.5 to 9.7)
99.1
(98.8 to 99.3)
9.4
(8.4 to 10.4)
13.7
(10.3 to 18.2)
 Strategy 398.0
(94.0 to 100.0)
79.8
(78.4 to 81.2)
7.0
(6.5 to 7.5)
99.9
(99.7 to 100.0)
11.9
(10.8 to 13.0)
14.3
(13.3 to 15.4)
≥CIN3
 Strategy 1100.0
(100.0 to 100.0)
86.4
(85.2 to 87.5)
6.3
(5.8 to 6.8)
100.0
(100.0 to 100.0)
7.8
(6.8 to 8.7)
15.9
(14.7 to 17.2)
 Strategy 256.7
(38.9 to 74.4)
90.2
(89.2 to 91.2)
5.2
(3.8 to 7.1)
99.5
(99.3 to 99.7)
9.4
(8.4 to 10.4)
19.2
(14.1 to 26.3)
 Strategy 3100.0
(100.0 to 100.0)
79.3
(77.9 to 80.7)
4.2
(4.0 to 4.5)
100.0
(100.0 to 100.0)
11.9
(10.8 to 13.0)
23.8
(22.2 to 25.0)
  • CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; NNR, the number of performed colposcopies to detect one case; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.