Table 6

Heterogenous impacts of chronic diseases diagnoses on total weekly alcohol consumption

(1)(2)(3)(4)
(A) Male(B) Female(C) Age<median(D) Age≥median
Number of chronic diseases diagnosed (current)−1.653***−0.302−1.250***−0.696***
(0.317)(0.192)(0.318)(0.213)
Control variablesYesYesYesYes
Within-individual means of controlsYesYesYesYes
Province fixed effectsYesYesYesYes
Survey-wave fixed effectsYesYesYesYes
Number of individual-wave observations8917979094739234
Log pseudolikelihood−23080.043−4678.1720−16460.664−11566.023
(E) Rural residents(F) Urban residents(G) No health insurance(H) With health insurance
Number of chronic diseases diagnosed (current)−1.223***−0.502**−1.045**−0.689***
(0.247)(0.227)(0.506)(0.189)
Control variablesYesYesYesYes
Within-individual means of controlsYesYesYesYes
Province fixed effectsYesYesYesYes
Survey-wave fixed effectsYesYesYesYes
Number of individual-wave observations11 8596848536513 342
Log pseudolikelihood−18006.406−9735.883−8331.663−19601.007
(I) Not smoking(J) Smoking(K) No other drinkers in household(L) Other drinkers in household
Number of chronic diseases diagnosed (current)−0.709***−1.372***−1.218***−0.632**
(0.179)(0.494)(0.256)(0.257)
Control variablesYesYesYesYes
Within-individual means of controlsYesYesYesYes
Province fixed effectsYesYesYesYes
Survey-wave fixed effectsYesYesYesYes
Number of individual-wave observations13 803490410 3178390
Log pseudolikelihood−13653.346−14228.689−16099.332−11961.540
(M) Health status=‘Fair’ or below(N) Health status=‘good’ or above(O) <2 chronic diseases diagnosed(P) ≥2 chronic diseases diagnosed
Number of chronic diseases diagnosed (current)0.750***−0.960***−0.437*−1.461***
(0.232)(0.290)(0.245)(0.512)
Control variablesYesYesYesYes
Within-individual means of controlsYesYesYesYes
Province fixed effectsYesYesYesYes
Survey-wave fixed effectsYesYesYesYes
Number of individual-wave observations10 290841717 0911616
Log pseudolikelihood−13510.42−14658.393−26329.010−1558.112
  • ‘Control variables’ include those reported in columns (8) of table 2. Marginal effects for the non-censored population Embedded Image reported.

  • SEs in parentheses, adjusted for intra-individual clustering.

  • *p<0.1, **p<0.05, ***p<0.01.