Table 3

Influences of different coping strategies on domains of emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation and personal accomplishment under burnout syndrome through analysis of the slope of the regression line

Coping strategies
(Brief COPE)
Emotional exhaustion
B (r2)
Depersonalisation
B (r2)
Personal accomplishment
B (r2)
Problem focused
 Active coping1.041 (0.02)−0.032 (0.00)2.418 (0.17)**
 Planning0.562 (0.00)−0.083 (0.00)2.557 (0.18)**
 Use of instrumental support1.408 (0.04)0.269 (0.01)0.614 (0.01)
Emotion focused
 Use of emotional support1.803 (0.07)*0.331 (0.02)**0.737 (0.02)
 Positive reframing0.385 (0.00)−0.218 (0.01)2.224 (0.13)**
 Acceptance1.500 (0.04)0.237 (0.01)1.570 (0.09)
 Religion−0.470 (0.00)−0.290 (0.01)*1.381 (0.04)**
 Humour2.455 (0.07)**0.843 (0.07)***−0.436 (0.00)
Dysfunctional
 Venting3.771 (0.18)**0.944 (0.09)**−0.812 (0.02)
 Denial1.807 (0.04)0.938 (0.09)***−1.124 (0.00)
 Substance use2.652 (0.01)**0.973 (0.01)*−1.127 (0.00)*
 Behavioural disengagement4.350 (0.18)***1.293 (0.13)***−2.000 (0.07)***
 Self-distraction2.428 (0.13)**0.396 (0.03)**0.885 (0.03)
 Self-blame1.702 (0.04)0.698 (0.06)*−1.602 (0.07)**
  • B denotes β-coefficient, and r2 denotes the coefficient of determination.

  • *P<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.