Table 2

Some of the parameters in the scenarios

Benchmark scenarioScenario 1
(Plan A)
Scenario 2
(Plan B)
Scenario 3
(Plan C)
Stringency Index (SI)020–2520–4020–60
Appointment type (on average)F2F: 100%
Remote: 0%
F2F: 70%
Remote: 30%
F2F: 50%
Remote: 50%
F2F: 40%
Remote: 60%
Referral rate to LF testing40%–45%15%–20%8%–12%2%–4%
PR programme type (on average)F2F: 100%
Remote: 0%
F2F: 25%
Remote: 75%
F2F: 15%
Remote: 85%
F2F: 0%
Remote: 100%
  • F2F, face-to-face; LF, lung function; PR, pulmonary rehabilitation.