Table 1

Assessment of methodological quality

StudyQ1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9Q10Q11Q12Q13Total
Winkler et al 199916UUUNNUYYYYYYY18/26
Gonzalez-Ortiz et al 201015UUYYYUYYYYYYY23/26
Stracke et al 200831YUYUYUYYYYYYY23/26
Rabbani et al 200919YYYYYYYUUYYYY24/26
Shahmiri et al 201343UYYYYYYYYYYYY25/26
Alkhalaf et al 201029UUYYYUYYYYYYY23/26
  • JBI critical appraisal checklist for randomised controlled trials: Q1: Was true randomisation used for assignment of participants to treatment groups? Q2: Was allocation to treatment groups concealed? Q3: Were treatment groups similar at the baseline? Q4: Were participants blind to treatment assignment? Q5: Were those delivering treatment blind to treatment assignment? Q6: Were outcomes assessors blind to treatment assignment? Q7: Were treatments groups treated identically other than the intervention of interest? Q8: Was follow-up complete, and if not, were strategies to address incomplete follow-up utilised? Q9: Were participants analysed in the groups to which they were randomised? Q10: Were outcomes measured in the same way for treatment groups? Q11: Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? Q12: Was appropriate statistical analysis used? Q13: Was the trial design appropriate, and any deviations from the standard RCT design (individual randomisation, parallel groups) accounted for in the conduct and analysis of the trial?

  • N=0, U=1, Y=2 points.

  • N, no; NA, not applicable; RCT, randomised controlled trials; U, unclear; Y, yes.