Table 3

Risk differences for adverse events from comparative studies

OutcomeExposureNo of studiesNo of participantsFollow-up (weeks)Risk with cannabis (/1000)Risk with comparator (/1000)Risk difference (95% CI)CertaintyReasons for downgrading
All adverse eventsNabilone versus gabapentin122024404534−13.1% (−26.2 to 0)Very lowRisk of bias (two levels), imprecision
Adverse events causing discontinuationHerbal cannabis versus standard care1431524704.7% (1.8 to 7.5)LowRisk of bias (two levels),
Nabilone versus gabapentin12202496190−9.4% (−18.5 to -0.2)Very lowRisk of bias (two levels), imprecision
SeriousHerbal cannabis versus standard care1431521301941.5% (−8.3 to 20.2)*LowRisk of bias, imprecision
Nabilone versus gabapentin122024000% (0 to 0)Very lowRisk of bias (two levels), imprecision
Psychiatric disorderHerbal cannabis versus standard care1431522199716.9% (5.8 to 40.5)†Very lowRisk of bias (two levels), imprecision
SuicideHerbal cannabis versus standard care14315205−0.5% (−1.4 to 0.4)LowRisk of bias (two levels)
ManiaHerbal cannabis versus standard care143152500.5% (−0.4 to 1.4)LowRisk of bias (two levels)
HallucinationsHerbal cannabis versus standard care143152500.5% (−0.4 to 1.4)LowRisk of bias (two levels)
DelusionsHerbal cannabis versus standard care14315205−0.5% (−1.4 to 0.4)LowRisk of bias (two levels)
DepressionHerbal cannabis versus standard care14315247460.1% (−4 to 4)LowRisk of bias (two levels)
ParanoiaHerbal cannabis versus standard care143152900.9% (−0.4 to 2.2)LowRisk of bias (two levels)
AnxietyHerbal cannabis versus standard care1431524793.8% (0.6 to 6.8)LowRisk of bias (two levels)
EuphoriaHerbal cannabis versus standard care1431524204.2% (1.5 to 6.9)LowRisk of bias (two levels)
Memory impairmentHerbal cannabis versus standard care1431521901.9% (0.1 to 3.7)LowRisk of bias (two levels)
ConfusionHerbal cannabis versus standard care1431521419−0.5% (−2.8 to 1.9)LowRisk of bias (two levels)
Disturbance in attentionHerbal cannabis versus standard care1431522391.4% (−1 to 3.8)LowRisk of bias (two levels)
FallsHerbal cannabis versus standard care14315223230% (−2.8 to 2.9)LowRisk of bias (two levels)
Motor vehicle accidentsHerbal cannabis versus standard care143152500.5% (−0.4 to 1.4)LowRisk of bias (two levels)
Withdrawal syndromeHerbal cannabis versus standard care143152500.5% (−0.4 to 1.4)Very lowRisk of bias (two levels),
  • *Risk difference calculated from adjusted incident rate ratio reported in study.

  • †Risk difference calculated from unadjusted incident rate ratio reported in study.