Table 4

Fixed and random effect analyses of the association between healthcare decision making and cervical cancer screening

VariableModel OModel I
AOR (95% CI)
Model II
AOR (95% CI)
Model III
AOR (95% CI)
Fixed effect model
Women’s healthcare decision making
 Husband or partner/someone/others1 (1.00 to 1.00)1 (1.00 to 1.00)
 Respondent alone1.66** (1.44 to 1.90)1.66** (1.44 to 1.91)
 Respondent and husband/partner1.38*** (1.19 to 1.59)1.38*** (1.19 to 1.59)
Women’s age (years)
 15–191 (1.00 to 1.00)1 (1.00 to 1.00)
 20–241.39 (0.89 to 2.18)1.32 (0.84 to 2.07)
 25–292.25*** (1.45 to 3.50)2.08** (1.33 to 3.26)
 30–343.20*** (2.03 to 5.05)2.89*** (1.82 to 4.60)
 35–394.06*** (2.58 to 6.40)3.66*** (2.30 to 5.80)
 40–445.28*** (3.31 to 8.45)4.73*** (2.94 to 7.59)
 45–495.82*** (3.57 to 9.50)5.18*** (3.15 to 8.52)
Educational level
 No education1 (1.00 to 1.00)1 (1.00 to 1.00)
 Primary1.51** (1.17 to 1.95)1.47** (1.14 to 1.90)
 Secondary1.65*** (1.28 to 2.12)1.51** (1.18 to 1.95)
 Higher2.45*** (1.81 to 3.30)2.13*** (1.57 to 2.88)
Marital status
 Married1 (1.00 to 1.00)1 (1.00 to 1.00)
 Cohabiting0.79*** (0.69 to 0.91)0.79***(0.69 to 0.91)
Religion
 Christianity1 (1.00 to 1.00)1 (1.00 to 1.00)
 Islamic0.40*** (0.31 to 0.53)0.38*** (0.29 to 0.51)
 African Traditional0.21*** (0.09 to 0.53)0.21***(0.09 to 0.53)
 No religion0.59** (0.40 to 0.86)0.61** (0.42 to 0.88)
 Others2.21*** (1.66 to 2.96)2.11*** (1.57 to 2.82)
Current working status
 No1 (1.00 to 1.00)1 (1.00 to 1.00)
 Yes1.06 (0.95 to 1.19)1.05 (0.94 to 1.18)
Parity
 01 (1.00 to 1.00)1 (1.00 to 1.00)
 10.94 (0.74 to 1.19)0.95 (0.75 to 1.21)
 20.98 (0.78 to 1.25)1.02 (0.80 to 1.29)
 30.91 (0.72 to 1.16)0.96 (0.76 to 1.22)
 4 or more0.64*** (0.50 to 0.82)0.70** (0.55 to 0.89)
Heard of cervical cancer
 No1 (1.00 to 1.00)1 (1.00 to 1.00)
 Yes32.05*** (19.60 to 52.41)32.74*** (20.02 to 53.55)
Frequency of reading newspaper or magazine
 Not at all1 (1.00 to 1.00)1 (1.00 to 1.00)
 Less than once a week1.56*** (1.37 to 1.79)1.55***(1.35 to 1.77)
 At least once a week2.19*** (1.89 to 2.53)2.11***(1.83 to 2.44)
Frequency of listening to radio
 Not at all1 (1.00 to 1.00)1 (1.00 to 1.00)
 Less than once a week1.12 (0.96 to 1.31)1.12 (0.95 to 1.31)
 At least once a week1.32*** 1.16 to 1.50)1.35*** (1.18 to 1.52)
Frequency of watching television
 Not at all1 (1.00 to 1.00)1 (1.00 to 1.00)
 Less than once a week1.05 (0.90 to 1.23)0.94 (0.80 to 1.10)
 At least once a week1.27***(1.13 to 1.43)1.00 (0.87 to 1.15)
Wealth index
 Poorest1 (1.00 to 1.00)1 (1.00 to 1.00)
 Poorer1.82***(1.45 to 2.28)1.18 (0.95 to 1.46)
 Middle2.22***(1.77 to 2.80)1.11 (0.89 to 1.38)
 Richer3.51***(2.77 to 4.45)1.30* (1.03 to 1.63)
 Richest6.94***(5.39 to 8.94)1.55***(1.20 to 2.00)
Place of residence
 Urban1 (1.00 to 1.00)1 (1.00 to 1.00)
 Rural0.93 (0.78 to 1.10)0.81** (0.69 to 0.95)
Random effect model
 PSU variance (95% CI)0.50 (0.41 to 0.60)0.28 (0.22 to 0.36)0.44 (0.35 to 0.55)0.26 (0.20 to 0.34)
 ICC0.130.080.120.07
 Wald χ2Reference1317.39***389.45***1339.88***
Model fitness
 Log-likelihood−11 169.99−8800.55−10 594.44−8768.79
 AIC22 34417 661.121 202.8917 607.57
 N28 45728 45728 45728 457
 Number of clusters1480148014801480
  • Exponentiated coefficients; 95% CIs in brackets.

  • *P<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

  • 1, reference category; AIC, Akaike’s information criterion; AOR, adjusted OR; ICC, intraclass correlation; PSU, primary sampling unit.