Item | n (%) |
Cost data collection design | |
Prospectively | 9 (17) |
Retrospectively | 11 (21) |
Combined | 1 (2) |
Not reported | 31 (60) |
Perspective specified | |
Healthcare system | 8 (15) |
Society | 4 (8) |
Small-scale stakeholders* | 3 (6) |
Not reported | 37 (71) |
Method by which resource was identified† | |
Accounting/financing department | 4 (8) |
Standardised reporting template | 8 (15) |
Administrative databases | 8 (15) |
Direct observation | 1 (2) |
Not reported | 32 (62) |
Costing method† | |
Activity-based costing | 3 (6) |
Microcosting/ingredient approach | 7 (13) |
Budget approach (gross costing/average costs) | 8 (15) |
Cost analysis | 6 (12) |
Bottom-up approach | 2 (4) |
Direct/detailed cost calculation | 2 (4) |
Not reported | 28 (54) |
IS cost collection instrument† | |
Activity log | 13 (25) |
Standardised template/questionnaires | 19 (37) |
Direct observation | 1 (2) |
On-site database/records | 9 (17) |
Time-motion survey/observation | 2 (4) |
Not reported | 21 (40) |
IS cost data collection platform/tools† | |
Computer based (eg, Excel, Microsoft Access) | 13 (25) |
Paper based (receipt, attendance record) | 1 (2) |
Telephone | 2 (4) |
In person | 1 (2) |
1 (2) | |
Website based | 2 (4) |
Electronic database (eg, accounting system, EHR) | 4 (8) |
Not reported | 30 (58) |
Cost inflation | 22 (42) |
Reference year | 22 (42) |
Using qualitative data to collect cost information | 12 (23) |
Separate reporting of quantity and unit cost data | 18 (35) |
*Included implementation organisation/staff or local government/community.
†Some studies reported more than one approach.
EHR, electronic health record; IS, Implementation strategy.