Table 3

Summary of costing approach of the included studies

Itemn (%)
Cost data collection design
 Prospectively9 (17)
 Retrospectively11 (21)
 Combined1 (2)
 Not reported31 (60)
Perspective specified
 Healthcare system8 (15)
 Society4 (8)
 Small-scale stakeholders*3 (6)
 Not reported37 (71)
Method by which resource was identified†
 Accounting/financing department4 (8)
 Standardised reporting template8 (15)
 Administrative databases8 (15)
 Direct observation1 (2)
 Not reported32 (62)
Costing method†
 Activity-based costing3 (6)
 Microcosting/ingredient approach7 (13)
 Budget approach (gross costing/average costs)8 (15)
 Cost analysis6 (12)
 Bottom-up approach2 (4)
 Direct/detailed cost calculation2 (4)
 Not reported28 (54)
IS cost collection instrument†
 Activity log13 (25)
 Standardised template/questionnaires19 (37)
 Direct observation1 (2)
 On-site database/records9 (17)
 Time-motion survey/observation2 (4)
 Not reported21 (40)
IS cost data collection platform/tools†
 Computer based (eg, Excel, Microsoft Access)13 (25)
 Paper based (receipt, attendance record)1 (2)
 Telephone2 (4)
 In person1 (2)
 Email1 (2)
 Website based2 (4)
 Electronic database (eg, accounting system, EHR)4 (8)
 Not reported30 (58)
Cost inflation22 (42)
Reference year22 (42)
Using qualitative data to collect cost information12 (23)
Separate reporting of quantity and unit cost data18 (35)
  • *Included implementation organisation/staff or local government/community.

  • †Some studies reported more than one approach.

  • EHR, electronic health record; IS, Implementation strategy.