Table 2

Overview of codesign input sources and data contributions

InputParticipantsStudy stageTime frameDemographic informationMode of contribution to codesignOutput generated
PPI/stakeholder group
(headteachers×2; parents×2;
voluntary/community sector mental health in schools expert)
N=5Stages 1–4Pre study—month 12Age, mean (SD)49.3 (7.4)Regular meetings to share findings and discussion of study progress.The dedicated PPI/stakeholder group members are part of the research team and provided guidance and recommendations on study findings and developments.
Females (n)2
Practitioners who provide mental health support in schoolsN=2Stage 1Months 1–2Age, mean (SD)54.5 (12.0)Focus group interview conducted face to face (qualitative).Perceptions of how the screening/intervention procedures should be introduced in schools, delivered, concerns and possible solutions.
Females (n)2
N=15Stage 4Months 6–8Age, mean (SD)38 (10.5)Semistructured interviews conducted remotely (qualitative).
Females (n)14
Y4 childrenN=8Stage 1Months 1–2Age range, years8–9Focus group interview conducted face to face (qualitative).Perceptions of how the screening/intervention procedures should be introduced to the class, carried out, concerns and possible solutions.
Females (n)6
N=29Stage 2Months 2–6Age, mean (SD)8.5 (0.6)Completed screening questionnaires for likely anxiety problems (quantitative).Identification of children who are likely to have problems with anxiety.
Females (n)19
N=2Stage 4Months 6–8Age, mean (SD)9 (0)Semistructured interviews conducted remotely (qualitative).Experience of the screening pathway and intervention.
Females (n)2
Y4 parentsN=7Stage 1Months 1–2Age, mean (SD)43.7 (3.6)Focus group interview conducted face to face (qualitative).Perceptions of how the screening/intervention procedures should be introduced to families, delivered in schools, concerns and possible solutions.
Females (n)6
N=29Stage 2Months 2–6Age, mean (SD)42.0 (3.4)Completed screening questionnaires for likely anxiety problems (quantitative).Identification of children who are likely to have problems with anxiety.
Females (n)24
N=2Stage 3Months 5–6Age, mean (SD)46.5 (0.7)Cued-recall interviews conducted via telephone (qualitative).Experience of the screening pathway and receiving feedback on scores.
Females (n)2
N=7Stage 4Months 6–8Age, mean (SD)43.6 (2.2)Semistructured interviews conducted remotely (qualitative).Experience of the screening pathway and intervention. Includes parents who dropped out (n=2).
Females (n)6
Parents in challenging circumstancesN=10Stage 4Months 5–12Age, mean (SD)47.1 (7.6)Semistructured interviews conducted remotely (qualitative).Perceptions of how a school screening/intervention pathway could be delivered in schools and possible barriers/facilitators to taking part.
Females (n)7
School staffN=6Stage 1Months 1–2Age, mean (SD)48.0 (7.4)Focus group interview conducted face to face (qualitative).Perceptions of how the screening/intervention procedures should be introduced, delivered, concerns and possible solutions.
Females (n)6
N=4Stage 2Months 2–6Age, mean (SD)41.8 (8.3)Screening questionnaires for likely anxiety problems (quantitative).Identification of children who are likely to have problems with anxiety.
Females (n)2
N=5Stage 4Months 6–9Age, mean (SD)41.6 (7.2)Semistructured interviews conducted remotely (qualitative).Experience of the screening pathway, perceptions of the intervention offered to families and perceived barriers/facilitators to uptake in schools.
Females (n)3
  • PPI, patient and public involvement; Y4, year 4.