Table 3

Results from mixed effects negative binomial regression examining changes in canteen spend pre-implementation vs post implementation of smoke-free prison policy

VariableTotal spend (£)Nicotine-related products (£)Food items (£)
IRR (99% CI)IRR (99% CI)IRR (99% CI)
Full sample n=11 944 (group 1)Prechange vs postchange0.92 (0.84 to 1.00)0.40 (0.33 to 0.51)†1.12 (0.99 to 1.27)
Change in time trend1.00 (1.00 to 1.00)1.02 (1.01 to 1.03)†1.00 (1.00 to 1.01)
Pretime trend1.00 (1.00 to 1.00)0.99 (0.99 to 1.00)1.00 (0.99 to 1.00)
‘Smokers’ resident within a prison for more than 31 weeks (periods 1–3) n=2541 (group 2)Prechange vs postchange0.91 (0.81 to 1.03)0.35 (0.25 to 0.50)†1.24 (1.08 to 1.43)*
Change in time trend1.00 (1.00 to 1.01)1.02 (1.01 to 1.04)†1.00 (0.99 to 1.00)
Pretime trend1.00 (1.00 to 1.00)0.99 (0.99 to 1.00)1.00 (1.00 to 1.00)
‘Non-smokers’ resident within a prison for more than 31 weeks n=342 (group 3)Prechange vs postchange0.87 (0.66 to 1.16)0.08 (0.00 to 1.62)0.80 (0.540 to 1.19)
Change in time trend1.01 (0.99 to 1.02)1.18 (1.03 to 1.36)1.01 (0.99 to 1.02)
Pretime trend1.00 (0.99 to 1.01)1.03 (0.93 to 1.14)1.00 (0.99 to 1.01)
  • *p<0.01

  • †p<0.001

  • IRR, incident rate ratio.