Table 2

GRADE summary of findings table

OutcomeFollow-up (years)Trainee revision/
cases,* n
Consultant revisions/
cases,* n
Net survival/relative risk (95% CI)Participants (studies), nQuality of evidenceComments
THR: net implant survival56501045NS: Trainee 97.9% (96.6% to 99.2%)
NS: Consultant 98.1% (97.1% to 99.2%)
1695 (3)26–28Very lowSerious ROB, indirectness and imprecision
10348734NS: Trainee 98.1% (95.9% to 99.1%)
NS: Consultant 96.7% (94.7% to 97.9%)
1082 (1)27LowSerious indirectness and imprecision
THR: crude revision rate513/91929/1794RR: 0.88 (0.46 to 1.70)2713 (3)12 26 27Very lowSerious ROB, indirectness, and imprecision
1013/63440/1318RR: 0.68 (0.37 to 1.26)1952 (2)13 27LowSerious indirectness and imprecision
TKR: net implant survival5236450NS: Trainee 97.9% (95.0% to 99.2%)
NS: Consultant 95.4% (93.0% to 97.0%)
686 (1)15LowSerious imprecision
10386550NS: Trainee 96.2% (94.0% to 98.4%)
NS: Consultant 95.1% (93.0% to 97.2%)
936 (2)15 29Very lowSerious inconsistency and imprecision
15150100NS: Trainee 91.0% (85.0% to 97.0%)
NS: Consultant 92.0% (90.0% to 94.0%)
250 (1)29Very lowSerious inconsistency and very serious imprecision
TKR: crude revision rate55/23620/450RR: 0.47 (0.18 to 1.25)686 (1)15LowSerious imprecision
108/23626/450RR: 0.58 (0.27 to 1.27)686 (1)15LowSerious imprecision
154/1504/100RR: 0.67 (0.17 to 2.60)250 (1)29Very lowSerious inconsistency and very serious imprecision
UKR: net implant survival10673411NS: Trainee 93.0% (90.3% to 95.7%)
NS: Consultant 93.9% (90.2% to 97.6%)
1084 (1)16LowSerious imprecision
UKR: crude revision rate51/1184/155RR: 0.33 (0.04 to 2.90)273 (1)30LowSerious imprecision
1031/67315/411RR: 1.26 (0.69 to 2.31)1084 (1)16LowSerious imprecision
  • *Number of revisions not reported for net implant survival.

  • GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; NS, net survival; ROB, risk of bias; RR, relative risk; THR, total hip replacement; TKR, total knee replacement; UKR, unicompartmental knee replacement.