Table 2

Characteristics of the included literature review articles dated 2017 (n=9)

First author (year)*Country†PopulationType of articleSpecific focus on decision-makingFocus of the paper
Grant
(2017)61
USAPatient, publicRapid systematic review
  • Discussed practical considerations for using online methods to engage patients in clinical guideline development

  • Online clinical guideline development

Harris (2017)24AustraliaConsumer, communityLiterature review followed by interviews
  • Proposed a model to integrate consumer views and preferences into resource allocation decisions

  • Consumer, community, engagement, health technology, technology and clinical practice, resource allocation

Jiang (2017)13CanadaPatient, family, advisory councilQualitative review
  • Summarised the literature regarding the implementation and organisational structures of Patient and Family Advisory Councils in cancer care centres in North America

  • Patient and family advisory council, cancer care, patient and family centred care

Kohler (2017)41CanadaPatient and family advisorsLiterature review followed by framework development
  • Developed a system-level implementation strategy to enhance inclusion of patient and family advisors in healthcare decision-making

  • Patient and family decision-making, primary healthcare

Pagatpatan
(2017)66
AustraliaPublicRealist synthesis
  • Identified and explained the underlying mechanisms and contextual factors that contribute to effective public participation in health policy and planning

  • Context-mechanism-outcome, context of political commitment

Rosenberg-Yunger (2017)80CanadaPatient, publicLiterature Review
  • Identified nine evaluation criteria that characterise optimum patient and public involvement in drug resource allocation decisions

  • Resource allocation, decision-making, consumer and patient participation

Selva (2017)51SpainPatient, family member, caregiver or their representativesSystematic review
  • Discussed the methodology provided in guidance documents for incorporating patients or representatives and patients’ views in the clinical guideline development process

  • Clinical guideline development, patient preference, patient views

Sharma
(2017)86
USAPatient, family, consumer and communitySystematic review
  • Investigated the impact of interventions involving patient advisory councils on clinical care outcomes, patient safety and patient satisfaction and the influence of patient advisors on healthcare changes

  • Patient advisory councils, experience of care, practice improvement

Young (2017)70CanadaPatient and family/caregiverScoping review
  • Explored the roles and opportunities for involving patients with rare diseases, families and patient organisations in the lifecycle of an orphan drug

  • Rare diseases, orphan drugs

  • *Year corresponds to when the article was first published online, which may be earlier than the date included in the citation.

  • †The affiliation of the first author.