Table 1

The main characteristics of the studies and the relevant data included in the meta-analyses

First authorYearCountryNMin age% MaleFollow-up (avg. months)ICU LoS
(days)
MortalitySeverity
(scaled avg.)
Raw measureComparisonQuality
Abelha2007Portugal11265+61.00%628.00%SF-36 *ICU survivors younger than 65 years oldM
Ali2018Australia3265+80.00%†1250.24EQ-5DAge-matched South Australian controlsH
Andersen2015Norway5380+69.00%40.81.981.52%0.27EQ-5DAge-matched and sex-matched Norwegian populationM
De Rooij2008Netherlands18780+51.00%44.41.2961.52%0.21EQ-5DAge-matched British populationM
Eddleston2000UK3965+52.45%†3SF-36*ICU survivors younger than 65 years oldM
Ferrao2015Portugal29066+‡26.00%27.6EQ-5DICU survivors younger than 65 years oldM
Grace2007Australia/NZ9960+NR2860.00%0.28EQ-5DRetrospective patient ratings for 1 week before ICUL
Hofhuis2011Netherlands4980+‡46.90%65.3540.83%0.25SF-36*Age-matched Dutch population and
retrospective proxy ratings for 4 weeks before ICU
M
Honselmann§2015Germany35265+53.40%122.5843.36%EQ-5DICU survivors younger than 65 years old
Honselmannc-d2015Germany29165+53.61%122.3443.36%EQ-5DAge-matched German controls
Jeitziner2015Switzerland12465+73.00%124.570.29SF-36*Age matched Swiss controls and
retrospective patient ratings for 1 week before ICU
M
Kaarola2006Finland29965+75.00%4757.00%EQ-5DICU survivors younger than 65 years oldM
Levinson2016Australia32280+58.00%†241.2821.45%SF-36*Age-matched and sex-matched Australian populationH
Merlani2007Switzerland3670+52.00%243.0063.00%0.26EQ-5DAge-matched Swiss populationM
Oeyen2007Netherlands6380+60.00%†1249.60%0.26EQ-5DRetrospective patient or proxy ratings for 1 week before ICUM
Sacanella2011Spain11265+57.00%123.3548.70%0.27EQ-5DRetrospective patient or proxy ratings before feeling ill and requiring ICUM
Schroder2011Denmark3675+56.00%129.453.85%SF-36*Age-matched Danish populationL
Sznajer2001France6565+‡55.90%†6EQ-5DICU survivors younger than 65 years oldM
Villa2016Spain5475+50.00%1243.18%0.23SF-36*Spanish population aged 75+M
Weighted avg.128.5369.5055.74%22.983.0244.92%0.26
Range23–35260–8026%–80%3–100.81.28–9.421.45%–81.52%0.12–0.34
  • See above for measures. Unless specified, we do not report data where it is not representative of at least 66.67% of the included sample.

  • Where the manuscript did not report the relevant information, we marked this as NR.

  • *Converted to EQ-5D composite score.

  • †Reported for study level only so not included in meta-analysis.

  • ‡Combined elderly groups.

  • §We analysed some unpublished data from Honselmann et al; therefore, we have presented descriptions for the full dataset only, without quality assessment.

  • ¶In the Honselmann study, the sample for the community study was slightly smaller than for the young/old comparison.

  • H, high quality; ICU, intensive care unit; L, low quality; LoS, length of stay; M, moderate quality.