Table 2

Patient satisfaction questionnaire regarding the results, delivery and content of the Energetic programme

Respondents, nEntirelyLargelySlightlyNot at all
Satisfaction with the results*
 Satisfaction with the intervention results2518 (73%)6 (25%)1 (2%)0
 Better management of impairments2513 (52%)9 (36%)3 (12%)0
 Recommendation of Energetic2517 (68%)8 (32%)00
Just rightToo few/too shortToo many/too long
Satisfaction with the number of sessions*
 Per week2525 (100%)00
 Aerobic exercise training2523 (92%)1 (4%)1 (4%)
 Physical education2520 (80%)2 (8%)3 (12%)
 Energy conservation management2421 (84%)1 (4%)2 (8%)
 Implementation relapse prevention2517 (68%)3 (12%)5 (20%)
Total period (16 weeks)2519 (76%)6 (24%)0
Satisfaction with the length of the sessions*
 Fatigue management2416 (64%)6 (24%)2 (8%)
 Aerobic exercise training2418 (72%)4 (16%)2 (8%)
 Education about aerobic exercise2420 (80%)2 (8%)2 (8%)
Involvement of partner/next of kin in energetic*2321 (84%)2 (8%)0
Mean rate 1–10 (SD)
Rating the content of the sessions†
 Energy conservation management247.6 (1.7)
 Aerobic exercise training248.8 (1.1)
 Education on aerobic exercise248.4 (1.0)
 Experience regular sports257.9 (1.4)
 Food and nutrition256.3 (2.4)
 Work/employment226.1 (2.5)
 Location/facilities258.4 (1.2)
 Physical therapists: physical training248.9 (1.0)
 Occupational therapist: energy conservation management248.7 (1.2)
Total programme energetic258.7 (1.1)
  • *Percentage responding patients with the number and length of sessions.

  • †Mean rating (standard deviation) of the content of the sessions by patients.