Table 2

Subgroup analyses by species or genus (Forest plots for all subgroup analyses available in online supplemental file 1)

SpeciesStudies (N)Effect size
L. acidophilus18 (6077)RR=0.66 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.80), p<0.0001
L. bulgaricus7 (1996)RR=0.60 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.97), p=0.04
L. casei11 (3382)RR=0.59 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.83), p=0.003
L. helveticus2 (239)Not significant
L. paracasei3 (665)RR=0.60 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.88), p=0.01
L. plantarum3 (325)Not significant
L. reuteri1 (23)Not significant
L. rhamnosus5 (779)RR=0.71 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.97), p=0.03
Lactobacillus spp28 (7851)RR=0.63 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.76), p<0.00001
S. boulardii9 (1827)RR=0.63 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.86), p=0.004
B. animalis ssp lactis6 (1351)RR=0.70 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.91), p=0.009
B. bifidum4 (3165)Not significant
B. licheniformis1 (181)RR=0.39 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.79), p=0.009
B. longum4 (366)RR=0.46 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.73), p=0.001
B. subtilis1 (271)RR=0.35 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.62), p=0.0004
S. thermophilus6 (1917)Not significant
C. butyricum1 (19)Not significant
B. clausii1 (130)RR=0.61 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.89), p=0.01
  • RR, risk ratio.