Table 2

Association of women’s empowerment and socioeconomic status with coverage of antenatal care in the pooled data (n=48 107)

CharacteristicsTotal
n (%)
Adequate ANC (%)
(95% CI)
Model I
OR (95% CI)
Mode II
AOR (95% CI)
Women’s empowerment and socioeconomic status (WESES)
 Poor
  Low empowered7270 (15.2)17.2 (15.8 to 18.7)1 (Ref)1 (Ref)
  Medium empowered3795 (13.1)18.6 (17.1 to 20.2)1.07 (0.96 to 1.19)1.07 (0.96 to 1.19)
  Highly empowered5634 (8.2)23.3 (21.5 to 25.2)1.50 (1.33 to 1.68)***1.33 (1.18 to 1.49)***
 Middle class
  Low empowered6293 (7.9)29.4 (27.2 to 31.6)2.02 (1.79 to 2.28)***1.57 (1.38 to 1.77)***
  Medium empowered3233 (6.7)26.9 (24.7 to 29.2)1.98 (1.75 to 2.24)***1.50 (1.32 to 1.70)***
  Highly empowered6611 (6.2)33.6 (30.8 to 36.5)2.65 (2.35 to 3.00)***1.91 (1.69 to 2.17)***
 Rich
  Low empowered3961 (11.7)35.1 (32.8 to 37.5)3.22 (2.88 to 3.60)***2.07 (1.84 to 2.32)***
  Medium empowered2990 (13.7)36.7 (34.0 to 39.4)3.57 (3.21 to 3.96)***2.22 (1.99 to 2.49)***
  Highly empowered8319 (17.3)44.2 (42.2 to 46.3)5.18 (4.68 to 5.72)***3.07 (2.75 to 3.43)***
Random variance parameter: variance (SE)
 Community level1.62 (0.06)1.48 (0.06)
 Country level1.03 (0.65)0.75 (0.47)
  • Model II was additionally adjusted by respondent’s age, number of children, media exposure, modern contraceptive usage, age at birth, wanted last pregnancy, husband’s educational level and place of region.

  • Significance level: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

  • Results of full models are presented in online supplemental appendix table 5.

  • ANC, antenatal care; AOR, adjusted OR; n, number of total respondents; Ref, reference category.