Table 2

Results of the diagnostic properties of MUAC screening for maternal nutritional status

CategoriesMUAC cut-off (cm)Sensitivity % (95% CI)Specificity % (95% CI)PPV%NPV%Likelihood ratio (LR+)Likelihood ratio (LR−)ACC%N
First visit (19−21)1138
 Underweight<25.7588.06 (82.57 to 92.05)65.73 (60.76 to 70.38)56.9191.463.00.1473.31311
 Adequate≥25.75; ≤28.10281
 Overweight>28.1072.46 (64.10 to 79.55)69.58 (63.58 to 75.00)55.5682.812.30.4370.58180
 Obese>30.1598.92 (95.78 to 99.81)60.39 (55.75 to 64.85)50.0099.292.5071.41366
Second visit (27−29)1076
 Underweight<25.7582.09 (74.32 to 87.97)77.39 (73.08 to 81.20)53.1493.2640.2578.51207
 Adequate≥25.75; ≤28.70356
 Overweight>28.7050.21 (43.69 to 56.73)84.52 (80.62 to 87.78)64.6775.052.50.6372.14184
 Obese>30.6099.44 (96.47 to 99.97)70.30 (66.07 to 74.21)54.4199.723.3077.95329
Third visit (37−39)770
 Underweight<25.7577.32 (67.48 to 84.95)82.26 (77.44 to 86.25)57.6992.063.50.3881.08130
 Adequate≥25.75; ≤29.45277
 Overweight>29.4542.86 (33.36 to 52.88)91.16 (87.16 to 94.03)63.3881.7140.6778.4571
 Obese>30.2594.74 (89.93 to 97.41)67.34 (62.45 to 71.88)55.4896.7530.1475.57292
  • Fisher’s exact test method which was statistically significant (p<0.05) for all categories at three set points analysed (p<0.0001).

  • ACC, accuracy; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.