Table 4

Subgroup analysis: participants likely to attend screening, frequency of mention of facilitators

ThemesIndividual codesParticipants likely to attend all screening modalitiesParticipants likely to attend screening by some, but not all screening modalities
BloodUrineCTUSSTotalTheme totalBloodUrineCTUSSTotalTheme total
n=510n=499n=510n=495n=2014n=79n=109n=22n=80n=290
Personal health beliefsLife extending/improved survival30335446163180410278
Family history of cancer2122700011
Risk of kidney cancer01271000000
PracticalitiesSimple to complete13121651614597932966419118215
Little or no inconvenience326423251446153731
Test can be conducted at GP132202379100221
Quick3340303113491721240
Cost effective67421923005
Opinions of the testPainless152142461245413531122133
Test non-invasive6162435810731828
Test is without risks16142227795911934
Comfortable having test4516161996711413
Have had test before2612203694830314
Effective test17141410558100321
Low radiation011011200011
Sufficient as a first test67111522015
Attitudes towards screeningEarly detection is a benefit7061949832373432391747
Detection for better tx/more tx options151525237811024
Sensible40415168200233513
For my general health/good2117413611511035
As part of other normal health checks94321862008
Want all screening/tests available4132454816602248
Benefits of screening outweigh the drawbacks741368251801004317
Cancer apprehensionWant to detect cancer4632394716438323271424
Peace of mind/reassurance45406668219130610
OtherGeneral agreement27182313819354221313
Influence of HCP recommendation31441200000
  • The colour gradients shown indicate where each value falls within the range of data shown, calculated within each subgroup

  • HCP, healthcare professional; tx, treatment; USS, ultrasound scan.