Table 1

Trends in age-adjusted prevalence of self-reported diabetes among women and men aged 40–84: the Tromsø Study 1994–2016

Tromsø 4Tromsø 5Tromsø 6Tromsø 7OR (95% CI)*P value
Prevalence, % (n)
WomenN=8653N=4031N=6394N=10 551
Total2.3 (227)2.8 (157)4.1 (295)4.6 (508)1.40 (1.31 to 1.49)<0.001
40–49 years0.7 (22)1.1 (8)2.1 (40)3.0 (101)2.05 (1.68 to 2.50)<0.001
50–59 years1.3 (29)2.0 (14)3.3 (44)3.7 (114)1.59 (1.32 to 1.90)<0.001
60–69 years3.5 (58)3.8 (58)5.4 (109)6.0 (151)1.32 (1.15 to 1.51)0.001
70–84 years7.4 (118)7.1 (77)8.9 (102)9.5 (142)1.15 (1.02 to 1.29)0.019
MenN=8020N=3161N=5694N=9676
Total2.4 (201)3.2 (142)5.1 (325)5.8 (583)1.52 (1.42 to 1.62)<0.001
40–49 years†1.1 (37)1.7 (10)2.4 (39)2.7 (83)1.52 (1.27 to 1.82)<0.001
50–59 years1.9 (42)3.7 (14)4.7 (55)5.1 (139)1.55 (1.33 to 1.80)<0.001
60–69 years3.9 (57)4.8 (60)7.9 (151)8.0 (202)1.42 (1.25 to 1.61)<0.001
70–84 years5.8 (65)6.5 (58)9.1 (80)10.8 (159)1.39 (1.22 to 1.59)<0.001
  • Proportions, ORs with CIs and p value for trend are adjusted for age across surveys using generalised estimating equation (GEE) models. N represents crude numbers.

  • *ORs for proportions are presented per 10 years.

  • †Logistic regression used for age adjustment (GEE model did not converge).