Table 1

Description of the included meta-analyses of associations between GORD and diverse diseases

Study, yearOutcomesNo. of studiesNo. of casesNo. of participantsMethod of GORD diagnosedType of metric*Effect modelEffect estimate and 95% CIP value of overall effectsP value of Q testI2(%)P value of Egger’s testQuality assessment toolAMSTAR 2
grading
Association between GORD and cancers
 Rubenstein,
 201941
OAC prevalence5 CCS5663285Symptom questionnaire and interview.ORRandom4.57 (3.89 to 5.36)<0.050.3660.139NACritically low
 Zhang, 201445Pharyngeal cancer risk2 CCS468118 724ICD-9 codes, symptomatic of GORD.ORRandom3.76 (0.21 to 67.48)0.370.000940.771NALow
 Parsel, 201840Laryngeal malignancy risk15 CCS36 50374 209Symptom questionnaire, De Meester’s criteria, OGD, pH monitoring; RFS; RSI score.ORRandom2.37 (1.79 to 3.14)<0.00001<0.00001950.528MINORSModerate
Association between GORD and respiratory diseases
 Havemann,
200737
Asthma prevalence7 CSS10 702254 978Questionnaire, physician interview and database review.ORRandom2.27 (1.81 to 2.84)<0.050.000850.062NACritically low
 Huang, 202038COPD exacerbations risk3 CCS82198pH monitoring or symptom questionnaire.ORFixed5.37 (2.71 to 10.64)<0.000010.9600.696AHRQLow
 Leason, 201739CRS prevalence4 CCS5391219 670Medical records and symptom questionnaire.ORFixed2.16 (1.37 to 3.48)0.0010.00085.40.373NACritically low
 Bedard Methot, 201936IPF risk18 CCS176012 574Read code, pH monitoring and HARQ score.ORRandom2.94 (1.95 to 4.42)<0.05<0.00001860.895NOSHigh
 Wu, 201844OSAHS prevalence1 CCS; 3 CSS4161042GORD questionnaire, pH monitoring, and OGD.ORRandom1.79 (1.00 to 3.22)0.050.03670.191Chorane hand bookLow
Association between GORD and digestive diseases
 Taylor, 201042BO prevalence26 CCSNANAQuestionnaire and interview.ORRandom2.90 (1.86 to 4.54)<0.050.000189P†NALow
 Wijarnpreecha, 201743NAFLD risk4 CCS; 4 CSSNA31 322Endoscopic assessment and reflux symptoms.ORRandom2.07 (1.54 to 2.79)<0.00001<0.0000187P‡NOSHigh
  • *Unadjusted OR, unless otherwise specified.

  • †The meta-analyses did not provide the p value of published bias but mentioned no published bias.

  • ‡The meta-analyses did not provide the p value of published bias but mentioned existed published bias.

  • AHRQ, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ; BO, Barrett’s oesophagus; CCS, case-controlled studies; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CRS, chronic rhinosinusitis; CSS, cross-sectional study; GORD, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; HARQ, Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire Study; ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; MINORS, Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; OAC, oesophageal adenocarcinoma; OGD, oesophagogast roduodenoscopy; OSAHS, obstructive sleep apnoea–hypopnoea syndrome; RFS, Reflux Finding Score; RSI, Reflux Symptom Index.