Table 4

Study characteristics

Authors
(year)
Duration of studySetting
(animal model, simulation, patients, cadavers)
Variable number (operation, USS)No. of participantsNo. of operators
Bouwsma et al (2018)
Netherlands11
2011–2014PatientsOperation: benign gynaecological surgery—hysterectomy and/or laparoscopic adnexal surgery
Usual care n=206
Care programme n=227
Usual care n=206
Care programme n=227
Secondary care
9 different hospitals
Grindlay and Grossman (2017)
USA12
October–Nov 2013Provider’s experience8 in-depth interviews8 providers, eligibility criteria: physician, advanced practice clinician, nurse, medical assistant/patient care coordinator, clinic manager, or counsellor on staff at a clinic providing medical abortion via TM. 8 clinic providers involved with medical abortion using telemedicine
Shehata et al (2016)
Canada13
July 2011–January 2015E-Consults directed to obstetrics and gynaecology394 e-consults directed to Ob-GynE-Consults were submitted by 151 primary care providers—126 medical doctors and 25 nurse practitioners—91% with urban practices and 9% with rural practices.All eConsults were answered by a single Royal College of Surgeons of Canada–certified obstetrician–gynaecologist (ob-gyn) who had been in independent practice for 7 years at the start of the project.
Hitt et al
(2016)
USA14
15 months
January 2014–April 2015
Patients940 unique patients seen via telecolposcopy940 patients had telecolposcopy performed at 8 remote sites, each given an impression based on the assessment by the hub-site clinician in UAMS located in central Arkansas.Number of doctors involved not specified.
Jefferis et al (2016)
UK15
5 years:
1 January 2010–31 December 2014
Patient requiring follow-up after tension-free vaginal tape insertion.262 patients who underwent day case tension-free vaginal tape insertion were followed up via telemedicine.262 patientsAll cases of primary retropubic TVT slings performed by one unit over a 5-year period.
No. operators not specified.
Ricard-Gauthier et al (2015)
Switzerland16
5 months:
July 2013–November 2013
Patients88 HPV-positive women were screened for cervical cancer.88 patients had cervical smartphone images taken for remote analysis.One on-site physician in Madagascar, and three physicians in Geneva analysing the smartphone images.
Catarino et al (2015)
Switzerland17
8 months; January 2014–August 2014Patients95 HPV-positive women were screened for cervical cancer95 patients had cervical smartphone images taken for remote analysis.One on-site expert in Madagascar, and three physicians in Geneva analysing the smartphone images.
Stratton et al (2015)
USA18
19 months:
September 2012–March 2014
Trial participants37 participants were enrolled over the 19-month time period.The largest proportion of participants (46%) was enrolled from the telecolposcopy network. Others were enrolled through outside institutions (43%), in-house referrals (8%), or direct advertisement (3%).
Most participants were motivated to join the study to take care of their health issues. Only 2 participants joined the Facebook private page.
The availability of a large number of potential participants from the telecolposcopy network increased recruitment to this clinical trial by 85% over other traditional means of recruitment.
Noordegraaf et al (2014)
Netherlands19
18 months:
March 2010–September 2011
PatientsWomen were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=110) or the control group (n=105).
The intervention group received an eHealth programme that provided personalised tailor‐made preoperative and postoperative instructions on the resumption of daily activities, including work.
The control group was provided with access to a control website.
A cohort of 215 women (aged 18–65 years) who had a hysterectomy and/or laparoscopic adnexal surgery for a benign indication.The trial was carried out in 6 general and/or teaching hospitals and one university hospital.
Gomperts et al (2014)
Netherlands20
This study analyses the data of women from Brazil who contacted Women on Web from 1 January through 31 December
2011 and performed a medical abortion provided through
Women on Web’s TM service.
Patients307 women who received and used the medication, and the outcome of the abortion was reported back.307 womenNS
Hitt et al (2013)
USA21
18 months:
January 2010–June 2011
Patients1298 telescopic exams1298 patients underwent examination using telemedicineColposcopy services via interactive TM were set up at 4 separate spoke sites.
During each weekly 3 hours clinic, an advanced nurse practitioner at each of the spoke sites performed the exams and collected biopsy specimens under the real-time, interactive supervision of an experienced faculty member at the hub site.
Exact number of operators not specified.
Gomperts et al (2011)
Netherlands22
20 months:
February 2007–September 2008
Patients2585 women from 88 countries where access to TOP is restricted, who received medication for a TOP and provided follow‐up information.2585 womenNS
Kldiashvili and Schrader (2010)
Georgia23
100 daysCytology slides420 gynaecological cytology cases420 cases4 cytologists
Radley et al (2006)
UK24
8 months:
June 2003 to January 2004
Patients432 women (204 in primary care and 228 in secondary care urogynaecology clinic)432 womenTwo general practices, two community health clinics and a secondary care urogynaecology clinic.
Perisic et al (2006)
Serbia and Montenegro25
NSPatients250 colpographs250 patientsGroup 1 consisted of 15 gynaecologists who were not trained in colposcopy and were from primary healthcare.
Group 2 consisted of six experienced colposcopists (specialists).
Group 3 was a supervising team consisting of three experts (colposcopists who had more than 15 years' colposcopy experience).
Etherington et al (2002)
UK26
NSPatients81 cases81 patients included for diagnosis comparison between telecolposcopic and colposcopic imagesNS
Allen-Davis et al (2002)
USA27
June 1996 to August 1996Patients485 patients underwent telephone evaluation followed by same day appointment with physician, nurse midwife or physicians assistant485 patientsNS
Atlas et al (2000)
Israel28
9 monthsInternational Tumour Board (ITB): Multidisciplinary team discussion of patient cases20 videoconferences, discussing 450 patients. Three key cases described.450 patient casesThe ITB consists of doctors trained in cancer surgery, chemotherapy, radiation oncology, diagnostic radiology and tumour pathology, as well as nurses, nutritionists and oncology social workers. Exact numbers not specified.
Tates et al (2016)
Netherlands29
NSSimulated patients48 simulated doctor–patient consultations6 certified simulated patients12 medical students
Gambadauro and Magos (2007)
UK30
6 monthsPatients: range of gynaecological interventions including abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic surgery.
Simulation: pelvi-trainer sessions in endoscopy skills laboratory.
20 operationsNSNS
Katz et al
(2017)
Israel31
Two separate sessions with groups of participantsE-learning simulationTwo training sessions, where participants were divided into those receiving an automated, self-assessment computerised case and an intervention group (WOZ) received the same computerised case accompanied by a human trainer supplying web-based immediate feedback and clarifications for each question.First experiment:
10 control, 8 intervention subjects
Second experiment:
7 control, 7 intervention subjects
NS
Yoost et al
(2017)
USA32
Eight hours long telehealth sessions were offered over a course of 4 weeks in the spring of 2015Computer e-learning8 teaching sessions55 students8 teaching sessions
Chekerov et al
(2008)
Germany33
20 months December 2004 to August 2006Online Gynaecological Cancer Conference39 Tumour Board Conferences
144 patients’ cases presented
667 participants121 peer-reviewed second opinions were sought
Haller and Gabathuler
(2003)
Switzerland34
1997–2001Lecture hall—videoconferencingNSNSNS
Chaves et al
(2017)
Brazil35
4 weeks
June–July 2016
Patients5 operations
(4 total abdominal hysterectomies and 1 oophoroplasty)
21 medical students/residents5 operations observed
Boatin et al
(2015)
Boston, USA36
30 months:
June 2012 to January 2015
Lectures30 lectures30 lectures with approximately 20 attendees per sessionNS
Browne et al
(2000)
USA37
Two years:
6-week rotation with video teleconference occurring across sites half way through clerkship
Video teleconference20–22 studemts between 5 clerkship sites every 6 weeks20–22 students, site coordinators, clerkship director, administrative staff and occasionally department chairperson between 5 clerkship sites.NS
Cordasco et al
(2015)
California, USA38
14 months:
October 2012– December 2013
Specialist at a ‘hub’ facility and primary care providers at multiple ‘spoke’ sites.14 1 hour monthly sessionsInterviews conducted with 18 primary care providersNumber of specialists delivering sessions not specified.
Van Dongen et al (2016)
Netherlands39
28 months:
February 2011–June 2013
Patients120 women starting their first ART cycle were randomised, 48% in the intervention group were compliant.120 womenWomen in the control group received care as usual, whereas women in the intervention group received in addition to their usual care access to a personalised e-therapy programme.
Number of e-therapists involved not specified.
Grossman and Grindlay (2017)
USA40
7 years:
July 2008–June 2015
Patients—adverse eventsDuring the study period, 8765 TM and 10 405 in-person medical abortions were performed.Total:
19170 medical abortions, 49 clinically significant events reported (0.18% telemedicine patients, 0.32% in-person patients)
NS
Mammas et al (2016)
Greece41
NSPelvic MRI sets of digital images10 sets of pelvic MRI digital images10 sets of pelvic MRI digital images2 consultant radiologists
Kim et al (2016)
South Korea42
1 year:
January 2013–December 2013
Patients100 cases from 5 centres were collected prospectively, of which 63 cases were valid to be included in the study.Total 63 cases and associated 567 images were finally analysed to assess intraobserver consensus.Nine certified specialists belonging to Korean Cervicography Research Group evaluated the digital images on DCS, 35 mm analogue slides, and scanned images without patient information.
Barlow et al (2012)
USA43
1 year:
July 2008–July 2009
Patients51 patient visits considered appropriate for telehalth, of which 28 patients/families expressed interest in telehealth.51 patient visitsNS
Schadel et al (2005)
Germany44
NSPatients286 patients, average 5 images per patient.315 patients participated in study, of which 286 patients were valid for re-evaluation by a second physician.NS
Etherington (2002)
UK45
NSPatients81 patients had full data available97 invited, 10 declined/did not attend all appointments, 6 had inadequate images, thus 81 women had full data for analysis.One experienced colposcopist
Stewart et al (2001)
UK46
January 1998 to December 1999Patients159 couples returned the questionnaire within 2 weeks of their follow-up discussion159 couplesOne clinic, number of clinicians involved in follow-up not specified
Harper et al (2000)
USA47
October 1997 to May 1998Patients79 women, number of images captured for each patient varied from 3 to 2079 womenNS
Quercia et al (2017)
Switzerland48
July and August 2016Patients151 patients151 patients recruited, application collected 44 items of information per patientNS
Haggerty et al (2016)
Romania49
Recruitment:
August 2012–May 2013
Weight loss programme 6 months
Patients20 patients10 patients: TM arm
10 patients: Texting arm
NS