Table 1

Definitions of implementation research outcomes

OutcomeDefinition
AcceptabilityThe perception among implementation stakeholders (beneficiaries and implementers) that the innovation is agreeable, palatable or satisfactory.
AdoptionThe intention, initial decision or action to try or employ the innovation (ie, uptake).
AppropriatenessThe perceived fit, relevance or compatibility of the innovation for a given practice setting, provider, or beneficiary; and/or perceived fit of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem (therapeutic use of hydroxyurea for sickle cell disease).
Cost(Incremental or implementation cost) is defined as the cost impact of an implementation effort.
FeasibilityThe extent to which the innovation can be successfully used or carried out within a given agency or setting.
FidelityDegree to which the innovation can be implemented as it was prescribed in the original protocol or as it was intended by the programme developer.
PenetrationThe integration of a practice within a service setting and its subsystems.
SustainabilityThe extent to which a newly implemented innovation is maintained or institutionalised within a service setting’s ongoing, stable operations.
  • Based on types of outcomes in implementation research reported within Proctor et al’s taxonomy for implementation outcomes (Proctor et al).21