Data analysis
| Data sources | How we process the information |
| Qualitative data | |
| Notes from FPE team meetings | Real-time coding of the data using periodic reflections categories |
| Interview with individual members of FPE staff | Code interview transcripts according to periodic reflection categories |
| Team Trello Board Calendar | Running log of team activities |
| Exit interviews with FPE CAP clinic staff | Inductively code transcripts to identify emerging themes |
| Process evaluation questions via email to FPE stakeholders and partners | Inductively code email responses to identify emerging themes regarding FPE context and partner perceptions |
| Quarterly update calls with FPE CAP Clinics | Checklists of process indicators will be used for both process and outcome evaluations |
| Process evaluation interview with FPE CAP clinic staff | Deductively code interview transcripts using modified CFIR code book (see description in mechanisms of impact section) to understand context, barriers and facilitators to implementation, and impact |
| Monthly process evaluation reports | Compiled by the process evaluator these reports will summarise several data sources |
| Monthly revisions to log frame | Evaluation team will review programme log frame to update any changes to process or outcome indicators being collected. Changes will be tracked to create a monthly snapshot of project changes. |
| Focus group interview with RJ CAB | Deductively code interview transcripts to identify emerging themes regarding context, barriers and facilitators to implementation for specific populations |
| Sexual and Reproductive Health Policy documents: drafted resolutions, white papers, policy briefs | Documents related to sexual and reproductive health policy in Utah will be indexed in a secure cloud content folder and time stamped to create an archive of evolving policy context |
| Quantitative Data | |
| Client exit surveys | Surveys completed by clients at FPE CAP clinics will be used for both the process and outcome evaluations. Indicators regarding client satisfaction will be used to measure mechanisms of impact for process evaluation. |
| Utah BRFSS survey data | Four questions were proposed and added to the state-wide Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, which is a weighted survey of health behaviours. The new questions asked individuals about contraceptive access, experiences of contraceptive counselling, and how they pay for their contraception. Survey responses will be analysed to understand how contraceptive access changes during the course of the intervention. |
| Media analytics report | Analytical data from the media campaign (eg, cost-per-valued-view, view-through rates, positive earned media, platform engagement) will be collected to determine the number of individuals reached by the campaign, and the effectiveness of the messaging. |
| Service delivery data | Clinics provide FPE with a monthly service delivery data report obtained through their electronic health records systems. This deidentified data include all contraceptive service codesand will allow FPE to assess level and trend changes in contraceptive service delivery over time. |
BRFSS, Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System; CFIR, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; FPE, Family Planning Elevated; FPE CAP, FPE Contraceptive Access Programme; RJ CAB, Reproductive Justice Advisory Board.