Table 2

Characteristics of included SRs

Ref.YearPopulationIntervention/ expositionComparisonOutcomesIncluded studiesCritical appraisal of study or reporting quality
DesignsPublishedSetting
SR without meta-analysis
Rashidian et al182014Term and preterm birthPerinatal regionalisationHistorical or concurrent control groups, comprised of usual care services (ie, no perinatal regionalisation)Mortality (neonatal, perinatal, maternal), morbidit, birth weight, stillbirth, place of delivery83 ITS1979–20076 USARisk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews
1 CBA1 FR
4 BA1 CA
Neogi et al192012Term and preterm birthPerinatal regionalisationNot born in level III centresNeonatal and perinatal mortality17*1 PC1979–200113 USAMOOSE guidelines (no results provided)
2 BA2 CA
1 UK
14 RC1 POR
Unit size/ case-volumeUnits, <1500 term births or <100 VLBW annually66 RC†1983–20063 USA
2 NO
1 GER
SR with meta-analysis
Lasswell et al202010Liveborn VLBW (≤1500 g), VPT (≤32 weeks’ GA) born ≥1976Perinatal regionalisationBirths at facilities with lower designated level of care, regardless of subsequent transferNeonatal mortality or pre-discharge/ in-hospital mortality129 RC1982–20088 USAUnreferenced own quality assessment (no results provided)
1 PC1 USA and EU
1 C–C1 CA
1 RCT1 SWE
1 NL
  • *The review authors reported the results of 13 studies; for four studies, the authors of this umbrella review extracted these missing results.

  • †Categorised by authors of the present umbrella review due to a lack of described study designs.

  • BA, before–after; CA, Canada; CBA, controlled before–after; C–C, case–control; EPOC, Cochrane's Effective Practice and Organisation of Care; EU, Europe; FR, France; GA, gestational age; GER, Germany; ITS, interrupted time series; MOOSE, Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology; NL, Netherlands; NO, Norway; PC, prospective cohort; POR, Portugal; RC, retrospective cohort; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SR, systematic review; SWE, Sweden; VLBW, very low birth weight; VPT, very preterm.