Table 3

Actions of bystanders in relation to gender and age (from 138 interviews)

Action takenGender (n=138)Age* (n=136)
MaleFemale<30 years30–60 years>60 years
% (n)% (n)% (n)% (n)% (n)
39.9% (55)60.1% (83)9.6% (13)55.9% (76)34.6% (47)
Positioning
Position supine, firm surface47.3% (26)27.7% (23)69.2% (9)48.7% (37)6.4% (3)
 Clothes removed from chest21.8% (12)20.5% (17)38.5% (5)27.6% (21)6.4% (3)
Position not suitable for CCs: RP25.5% (14)18.1% (15)23.1% (3)19.7% (15)21.3% (10)
Position not suitable for CCs, other than RP27.3% (15)54.2% (45)7.7% (1)31.6% (24)72.3% (34)
CC quality
CCs observed, effective†20.0% (11)12.0% (10)23.1% (3)23.7% (18)0.0% (0)
CCs observed, not effective†14.5% (8)8.4% (7)15.4% (2)15.8% (12)2.1% (1)
CCs not observed, but reported†14.5% (8)18.1% (15)15.4% (2)15.8% (12)19.1% (9)
 CCs started‡49.0% (27)38.5% (32)53.9% (7)55.3% (42)21.2% (9)
No CCs50.9% (28)61.4% (51)46.2% (6)44.7% (34)78.7% (37)
  • Association between ‘gender’ and ‘position’: p=0.016 (Fisher’s exact test).

  • Association between ‘gender’ and ‘CC quality’: p=0.332 (Fisher’s exact test).

  • Association between ‘age’ and ‘position’: p<0.001 (Kruskal-Wallis test).

  • Association between ‘age’ and ‘CC quality’: p<0.001 (Kruskal-Wallis test).

  • *Data for age missing for n=2.

  • †As assessed by the first EMS vehicle on scene.

  • ‡Sum of ‘CCs observed, effective’, ‘CCs observed, not effective’, ‘CCs not observed, but reported’.

  • CC, chest compression; RP, recovery position.