Table 2

Overview of the critical appraisal

Research paradigmMain issuesReferences
Qualitative
  • Lack of description of the relationship between the researcher and participant

33 36 39
  • No consideration of ethical issues

33
Quantitative
  • Inadequate sampling strategy to address the research questions

31 38
  • Non-representative sample/inadequate sampling

35 38
  • Low response rates (below 60%)

34 35 38
  • Assessments not standardised or validated

34 37
Systematic review
  • Undifferentiated approach to study designs

28
Mixed methods
  • No discussion of the limitations associated with research methods in a triangulation design

23 25–27 32
Qualitative
  • No consideration of how findings related to the context

32
  • Lack of description of the relationship between the researcher and participant

23 25–27 32
Quantitative
  • Inadequate sampling strategy to address the research questions

25 32
  • Non-representative sample/inadequate sampling

26 32
  • Assessments not standardised or validated

25
  • Low response rates (below 60%)

23