Table 2

Participant characteristics in systematic reviews that investigated interventions

First authorStudy designPublication yearPrimary studiesnAge (years)Intervention investigated
Liu33SR/MA RCTs2014211421Range: 18–80Acupuncture
Aminov8SR RCTs20184*97Mean: 62Virtual reality
Braun29SR RCTs20133*115Mean: 70.7Mental practice
Hoffmann16SR RCTs2011133Mean: 72Occupational therapy
Rogers31SR RCTs2018221098Mean: 62Cognitive remediation; rehabilitation for multiple domains
Tian37SR/MA RCTs20117*281Range: 37–43Transcranial magnetic stimulation
das Nair9SR RCTs201613*514Range: 31–68Memory training in memory rehabilitation
Loetscher32SR/MA RCTs20136223Mean: 65Cognitive rehabilitation for attention deficits
Hackett34SR RCTs20101*29Range: 57.8–73Antidepressant agents
Jongstra38SR RCTs20161*1784Mean: 73Antihypertension withdrawal
Mead39SR RCTs20127*425Range: 55–77 yearsSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
Yang40SR RCTs20151*62Range: 58–80Chinese herbal medicine—mailuoning
Sami28SR RCTs20152*94RCT 1: mean 64†
RCT 2: range 24–80‡
Dopamine agonists
Oberlin30SR/MA RCTs201714736Mean: 62.5Aerobic exercise and stretching
Pang35SR RCTs20131*38NAAerobic exercise and stretching
Hayes36SR RCTs20163*159Mean: 62Cardiovascular
Cumming26SR/MA RCTs201212482Range: 41–79Active sessions
Zheng27SR RCTs/CTs201610§394Range: 45–77Aerobic exercise
  • *Subset.

  • †Delbari et al.52

  • ‡Gorgoraptis et al.53

  • §Six RCTs/four CTs.

  • CT, controlled trial; ; MA, meta-analysis; NA, not available; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SR, systematic review.