Table 1

Characteristics of included studies and appraisal score (by alphabetical order)

Author and appraisal scroreYearCountrySettingDesignData collection tool(s)Sample populationFrequent users definitionAim
No of participantsAge range% Men
Digel Vandyk et al302018CanadaEmergency Department (ED)Qualitative study design/Interpretative Description/Thematic AnalysisSemistructured interviews1022–66 years40Twelve or more visits to the ED for mental health reasons within a 1-year frameExplore the experience of persons who frequently present to the ED for mental health reasons.
Dwamena et al292009USAPrimary careQualitative study design/grounded theoryIn-depth semistructured interviews1931–65 years16Eight or more visit a year for two consecutive years (see study protocol)41Describe and analyse perceptions and lived experiences of high utilising primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms.
Hodgson et al262005UKPrimary careQualitative study design/thematic analysisIn-depth, semistructured interviews3024–81 years60At least double the average number of visits in 12 months and an assessment that the visits did not have important clinical outcomes.Explore frequent users’ points of view on their healthcare usage, expectations from visits and perceived relationship with their people who presented on multiple occasions.
Malone281996USAEDInterpretative phenomenologyInformal interviews with participants and care providers; in-depth, loosely structured interviews with participants; group interviews with care providers; patient observation; medical records review4630–60 years65Four or more ED visits per yearDescribe the context for frequent ED use and what it means to both patients and healthcare providers.
Moss et al332014New ZealandEDQualitative study design/thematic analysis using Tronto’s ethic of care frameworkSemistructured interviews3417–77 years32Six ED visits in 1 yearUnderstand frequent users’ experience with healthcare providers and how this influences their subsequent choices in healthcare.
Neal et al272000UKPrimary careQualitative study design/thematic analysisSemistructured interviews, 36-item health status questionnaire28Mean: 54 years29Regular frequent users: at least one primary care visit in each 90 days period, no period of 10 visits in 90 days
Burst/Gap Frequent users: at least one burst (ten visits in 90 days) and at least one gap (period without visits over 90 days)
Understand the reason for frequent users’ high rates of primary care visits.
Olofsson et al232012SwedenEDDescriptive phenomenologyIn-depth interviews with open-ended questions1471–90 years36Three or more ED visits in the past 12 monthsDescribe and understand chronically ill elderly patients’ experiences during ED stays.
Olsson and Hansagi242001SwedenEDQualitative study design/thematic analysisIn-depth interviews with open-ended questions1023–82 years506–17 visits in the past 12 monthsExplore why patients believe they frequently use the ED.
Robinson et al322017AustraliaEDQualitative study design/thematic analysisSemistructured interviews, half of which included patients’ carers19Not specified63Three or more ED visits in 12 monthsExplore COPD patients’ experiences in frequently using ED services
Spence et al312008CanadaEDQualitative study design/Thematic AnalysisSemistructured interviews with patients and ED staff5218–45 years100Individuals who present themselves frequently to the EDInvestigate the repeated use of the ED by men with a history of suicidal behaviour and substance abuse to understand the needs and barriers to care for this high-risk group.
Wiklund-Gustin252011SwedenPrimary careInductive hermeneutic designIn-depth interviews with open-ended questions925–64 years44Five or more primary care visits in the last 12 monthsDescribe patients’ subjective experiences with the healthcare system as frequent users.
Wiklund-Gustin62013SwedenPrimary careQualitative study design using cognitive behavioural therapy frameworkIn-depth interviews with open-ended questions925–64 years44Five or more primary care visits in the last 12 monthsDescribe frequent attenders’ conception of life and their interaction with the healthcare system from a cognitive perspective.