Table 3
Pairwise agreement between treatment hierarchies obtained from the different ranking metrics measured by Spearman ρ, Kendall τ, Yilmaz 
and Average Overlap
 vs |  versus relative treatment effect |  versus relative treatment effect |  versus | |
| Spearmanρ | 0.9 (0.8 to 0.96) | 1 (0.99 to 1) | 0.9 (0.8 to 0.97) | 1 (0.98 to 1) |
| Kendallτ | 0.8 (0.67 to 0.91) | 1 (0.95 to 1) | 0.8 (0.69 to 0.91) | 1 (0.93 to 1) |
Yilmaz | 0.78 (0.6 to 0.9) | 1 (0.93 to 1) | 0.79 (0.65 to 0.9) | 1 (0.93 to 1) |
| Average Overlap | 0.85 (0.72 to 0.96) | 1 (0.91 to 1) | 0.88 (0.79 to 1) | 1 (0.94 to 1) |
Medians, first and third quartiles are reported.
Relative treatment effect stands for the relative treatment effect against fictional treatment of average performance.
PBV, probability of producing the best value; SUCRAB, surface under the cumulative ranking curve (calculated in Bayesian setting); SUCRAF, surface under the cumulative ranking curve (calculated in frequentist setting).