Frequency of SCIROCCO’s activities (figures represent number unless indicated otherwise)
| Step | Activities | Project target | Delivered (n (%)) | Region 1(B) | Region 2 (O) | Region 3 (N) | Region 4 (P) | Region 5 (S) | |
| 1 | Number of viability assessment of GPs in the five regions | 30 | 32 (106.7) | 7 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 7 | |
| Number of GPs selected and assessed for maturity assessment | Assessed with first designed methodology. | 15 | 15 (115.4) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Assessed with revised methodology (including all steps conducted of the revised process). | 15 | 14 (107.7) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 2 | Regions performed the complete self-assessment process | 5 | 5 (100) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Completed and documented assessments | 5 | 5 (100) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3 | Number of regions that performed role as transferring/coaching region in twinning and coaching activity | ≥5 | 5 (100) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Duration of study visit (up to 2 days) | 1.5 days | 0 day | 1.5 days | 1.5 days | One 1.5 days and one 1 day | ||||
| Number of regions that performed the role as receiving region | ≥5 | 7 (140) | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Agreed action plans to transfer and/or scale up interventions | ≥5 | 7 (140) | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
GPs, Good Practices; SCIROCCO, Scaling IntegRated Care in Context.