Vote 1: result of nominal group technique stakeholder group consensus of six candidate measures’ suitability for the assessment of exercise adherence
| How suitable are the six candidate measures of exercise adherence with respect to | Relevance Yes (%) | Feasibility Yes (%) | Acceptability Yes (%) | Appropriateness Yes (%) | Overall suitability Yes (%) |
| HRERS in routine practice | 7.1 | 85.7 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 14.3 |
| HRERS in clinical trials | 7.1 | 64.3 | 7.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| PRPS in routine practice | 14.3 | 85.7 | 0.0 | 14.3 | 14.3 |
| PRPS in clinical trials | 7.1 | 50.0 | 7.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| RAQ in clinical trials | 14.3 | 21.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| SIRAS in routine practice | 14.3 | 85.7 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 7.1 |
| SIRAS in clinical trials | 7.1 | 64.3 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| AESOP in routine practice | 0.0 | 7.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| AESOP in clinical trials | 0.0 | 14.3 | 7.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| CHAMPS in routine practice | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| CHAMPS in clinical trials | 0.0 | 21.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| RAQ in routine practice | 7.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| RAQ in clinical trials | 14.3 | 21.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
AESOP, Adherence to Exercise Scale for Older Patients; CHAMPS, Community Healthy Activities Model Programme for Seniors; HRERS, Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale; PRPS, Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale; RAQ, Rehabilitation Adherence Questionnaire (modified); SIRAS, Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale.