Description of the PICOTS strategy as applied to this study
Inclusion | |
Population | Age ≥18 years Diagnoses: urological neoplasia in adults:
|
Interventions |
|
Comparators | Comparison between open and robotic approaches in the treatment of urological cancers included in the list above |
Outcomes | Perioperative outcomes:
Oncological outcomes:
Functional outcomes:
Hospital costs:
|
Type of studies | All available clinical, prospective randomised and non-randomised trials and retrospective comparative studies (cohort or case–control series) comparing RRP versus ORP, RRC versus ORC, RPN versus OPN, RRN versus ORN and RRPLND versus ORPLND were included. Published between 2000 and 2020. |
Timing and setting | Any time point and setting |
eGFR, estimated glomerular rate; OPN, open partial nephrectomy; ORC, open radical cystectomy; ORN, open radical nephrectomy; ORP, open radical prostatectomy; ORPLND, open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection; PN, partial nephrectomy; RC, radical cystectomy; RN, radical nephrectomy; RP, radical prostatectomy; RPLND, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection; RPN, robotic partial nephrectomy; RRC, robotic radical cystectomy; RRN, robotic radical nephrectomy; RRP, robotic radical prostatectomy; RRPLND, robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.