Citation and country | Participants | Design | Aim | Key findings | Key methodological strengths and limitations; quality score |
Chassagne et al
2 (2017) France | Prisoners requiring palliative and end of life care (n=14) and those around them | Qualitative (unspecified)/ interviews | To highlight the realities regarding inmates at the end of life in France |
|
Strengths: Evident and appropriate design, study context clear, sampling appropriate and well described, well supported conclusions Limitations: Limited information on data collection and analysis, no verification procedures described, limited information on reflexivity Quality score: 63% |
Cloyes et al
31 (2014) USA | Louisiana inmate hospice volunteers who responded to a survey (n=75) | Ethnographic grounded theory/ surveys | To explore the beliefs and attitudes of inmate hospice volunteers, including motivations and the meaning of hospice to them |
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, study context clear, sampling appropriate and well described, data collection appropriate and well described, data analysis appropriate and well described, verification procedures present, well-supported conclusions Limitations: Partial connection to theoretical framework, limited information on reflexivity Quality score: 85% |
Cloyes et al
29 (2016) USA | Louisiana State Penitentiary prisoners, inmate hospice volunteers, healthcare staff and corrections officers (n=43) | Ethnographic case study/ interviews and observations | To describe factors essential to sustaining the prison hospice, from prisoner, corrections officer, healthcare staff, and inmate volunteer perspectives |
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, evident and appropriate design, study context clear, sampling appropriate and well described, data collection appropriate and well described, data analysis appropriate and well described, verification procedures present, well-supported conclusions Limitations: Partial connection to theoretical framework, limited information on reflexivity Quality score: 85% |
Cloyes et al
30 (2017) USA | Louisiana State Penitentiary prisoners, inmate hospice volunteers, healthcare staff and corrections officers (n=43) | Ethnographic case study/ interviews and observations | To describe how inmate hospice volunteers learn hospice care |
|
Strengths: Study context clear, sampling appropriate and well described, data collection appropriate and well described, data analysis appropriate and well described, verification procedures present, well-supported conclusions Limitations: Partial connection to theoretical framework, limited information on reflexivity Quality score: 80% |
Depner et al
32 (2017) USA | Inmate hospice volunteers (n=22) from a maximum security prison in the north-eastern USA | Consensual qualitative research/ interviews | To explore the phenomenological perspective of inmates participating in inmate facilitated hospice care with regard to meaning and purpose in life, attitudes on death and dying, and the personal impact of participation |
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, evident and appropriate design, study context clear, connected to theoretical framework, data collection appropriate and well described, data analysis appropriate and well described, verification procedures present, well-supported conclusions, reflexivity present Limitations: limited information on sampling Quality score: 95% |
Depner et al
33 (2018) USA | Inmate hospice volunteers (n=22) from a maximum security prison in the north-eastern USA | Consensual qualitative research/ interviews | To (a) describe a prison-based end of life programme utilising inmate peer caregivers, (b) identify inmate caregiver motivations for participation and (c) analyse the role of building trust and meaningful relationships within the correctional end of life care setting. |
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, evident and appropriate design, study context clear, sampling appropriate and well described, data collection appropriate and well described, data analysis appropriate and well described, verification procedures present, well-supported conclusions, reflexivity present Limitations: Partial connection to theoretical framework Quality score: 98% |
Handtke & Wangmo3 (2014) Switzerland | Older inmates in Swiss prisons (n=35) | Theoretical (Allmark’s concept of ‘death without indignities’)/ interviews | To investigate elderly prisoners' attitudes towards death and dying |
|
Strengths: Study context clear, connected to theoretical framework, sampling appropriate and well described, data collection appropriate and well described, data analysis appropriate and well described, verification procedures present, well-supported conclusions Limitations: Partial description of question and overall design, limited information on reflexivity Quality score: 85% |
Handtke et al
34 (2017) Switzerland | Older inmates in Swiss prisons (n=35) | Theoretical (Garland’s depiction of the criminology of the self and the criminology of the other)/ interviews | To (a) present opinions of older prisoners in Switzerland on early release on compassionate grounds, (b) to frame arguments against Garland's (1996) two criminologies of self and other, and (c) propose a middle way based on Garland's welfarist criminology and European human rights |
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, sampling appropriate and well described, data collection appropriate and well described, data analysis appropriate and well described, verification procedures present, well-supported conclusions Limitations: Limited information provided on design and the context for the study, as well as reflexivity Quality score: 83% |
Lillie et al
35 (2018) UK | Health professionals from a specialist palliative care provider (n=10) | Pilot study/ focus group | To understand the challenges faced by community palliative care providers when caring for those in custody |
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, study context clear, well-supported conclusions Limitations: Limited information on design, sampling, data analysis and reflexivity, not linked to theoretical framework, very limited information on data collection and verification procedures Quality score: 55% |
Loeb et al
36 (2014) USA | Current and potential users of palliative and end of life care services in a mid-Atlantic USA state (n=21) | Descriptive/ interviews | To examine the values, beliefs, and perceptions held by current and potential future consumers of end of life care in prisons to highlight the facilitators and barriers to providing compassionate care for those dying in prison. |
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, evident and appropriate design, study context clear, sampling appropriate and well described, data collection appropriate and well described, data analysis appropriate and well described, verification procedures present, well-supported conclusions Limitations: Limited information provided on reflexivity. Quality score: 88% |
Marti et al
37 (2017) Switzerland | Prisoners, corrections officers, healthcare staff, representatives of prison authorities and a prison chaplain instructor (n=62) | Ethnographic/ multimethod (interviews, observations, case study reconstructions) | To answer the following questions: (1) What are the institutional logics of the prison system and how are these logics challenged by the logic of long-term geriatric and EOL care? (2) How do these institutional logics shape everyday practices of prison officers and how do they also question, resist, and transform them in their daily work activities? | Themes:
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, evident and appropriate design, study context clear, connected to theoretical framework, well-supported conclusions Limitations: Partial information on sampling, data collection and data analysis, limited information on verification procedures and reflexivity Quality score: 65% |
Peacock et al
38 (2017) UK | Mixed sample of prisoners, prison officers, healthcare staff and others involved in prison service (n=62) | Action research/ interviews, focus groups and observations | To discuss the concept of ‘jail craft’ |
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, evident and appropriate design, study context clear, connected to theoretical framework, data collection appropriate and well described, verification procedures present, well-supported conclusions Limitations: Limited information on sampling strategy and reflexivity Quality score: 78% |
Penrod et al
39 (2014) USA | Central administrators for a state department of corrections (n=12) | Descriptive/ interviews | To describe perspectives of end of life care held by prison administrators in a state prison system to reveal challenges to changing practice in this area. |
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, evident and appropriate design, study context clear, data collection appropriate and well described, data analysis appropriate and well described, verification procedures present, well-supported conclusions Limitations: Partial information on sampling strategy and limited information on reflexivity Quality score: 83% |
Sanders & Stensland 40 (2018) USA | Prisoners nearing end of life in mid-western USA, who took part in an anticipatory care planning (ACP) session (n=20) | Qualitative (unspecified)/ observation of ACP session | To report on the inmate experience of approaching death in prison |
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, study context clear, data collection appropriate and well described, data analysis appropriate and well described, verification procedures present, well-supported conclusions Limitations: Partial information on design, connection to theoretical framework, and reflexivity Quality score: 83% |
Sanders et al
41 (2018) USA | Prisoners nearing end of life in mid-western USA, who took part in an ACP session (n=20) | Theoretical (Bandura’s agentic perspective)/ observation of ACP session | To develop insight about the opportunities and needs of offenders in directing the end of life care they receive and the dying process that they ultimately experience, which an agentic perspective facilitates. |
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, study context clear, connected to theoretical framework, sampling appropriate and well described, data collection appropriate and well described, data analysis appropriate and well described, verification procedures present, well-supported conclusions Limitations: Partial information on overall design and reflexivity Quality score: 90% |
Supiano et al
42 (2014) USA | All hospice volunteers in Louisiana State Penitentiary (n=36) | Descriptive/ interviews | To answer the following: (1) How do inmates recall death experiences that occurred prior to their entry into the hospice volunteer role? (2) How do volunteers describe the meaning of these deaths and any impact on their volunteer work? (3) How do volunteers describe the experience of caring for dying inmates? (4) Are these deaths associated with grief in the volunteers, and how is this grief addressed? |
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, evident and appropriate design, study context clear, sampling appropriate and well described, data collection appropriate and well described, data analysis appropriate and well described, verification procedures present, well-supported conclusions Limitations: Partial acknowledgement of reflexivity Quality score: 90% |
Turner et al
4 (2018) UK | Interviews with mixed correctional and healthcare staff and prisoners (n=64) and survey of elderly prisoners (n=127) | Mixed methods action research/ survey and interviews | To understand the social processes at work in a prison setting and how they impact on the provision of health and social care for ageing and dying prisoners |
|
Strengths: Question sufficiently described, evident and appropriate design, study context clear, data collection appropriate and well described, well supported conclusions Limitations: Limited information on verification procedures and reflexivity Quality score: 73% |