Study | Item evaluation criteria | ||||||||||||
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Q11 | Q12 | Total (%) | |
Trippolini et al 30 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 92% |
Lomond and Cote35 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 88% |
Pierrynowski et al 36 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 88% |
Trippolini et al29 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | N/A | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 86% |
Van der Meer et al 33 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | N/A | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 86% |
Ljungquist et al 37 KGV† | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 82% |
Ljungquist et al 38 Rel§ | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 79% |
Ljungquist et al 40 STC‡ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 79% |
Trippolini et al 31 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 75% |
Ljungquist et al 39 KGV† | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | N/A | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 68% |
Reneman et al 32 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 67% |
Reesink34* | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | N/A |
12-item evaluation tool (QACMRR) designed to assess the quality of studies determining measurement properties in outcome measures. Questions 1–12 in the tool evaluate aspects of study question, study design, measurements, analyses, and study recommendations.
*Paper is not applicable for completion of study quality tool
†KGV, known-groups validity
‡STC, sensitivity-to-change
§Rel, reliability
KGV, known-groups validity; rel, reliability; STC, sensitivity-to-change.