Table 4

Prevalence of different severity levels of DR and macular oedema by diabetes status

Newly diagnosed diabetes* (n=936)Known Diabetes*
(n=374)
P value†
Patient numberPrevalence (%) (95% CI)Patient numberPrevalence (%) (95% CI)
No DR83288.9 (86.8 to 90.9)24665.8 (61.0 to 70.6)
Any DR10411.1 (9.1 to 13.2)12934.5 (29.4 to 39.0)<0.001
DR grade<0.001
 Mild NPDR808.6 (6.8 to 10.4)5915.8 (12.1 to 19.5)
 Moderate NPDR171.8 (1.0 to 2.7)4812.8 (9.4 to 16.2)
 Severe NPDR60.6 (0.1 to 1.2)112.9 (1.2 to 4.7)
 PDR10.1 (0 to 0.3)112.9 (1.0 to 4.3)
VTDR91.0 (0.3 to 1.6)246.4 (3.9 to 8.9)<0.001
DME91.0 (0.3 to 1.6)277.2 (4.6 to 9.8)<0.001
CSME30.3 (0 to 0.7)92.4 (0.8 to 4.0)<0.001
  • *Of the 1,500 persons with type 2 DM, 1,310 had fundus photography results that were usable for DR grading.

  • †P value for the difference between newly diagnosed and known diabetic patients based on χ2 test.

  • CSME, clinically significant macular oedema; DME, diabetic macular oedema; DR, diabetic retinopathy; NPDR, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; VTDR, vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy.