Table 3

Association between alcohol consumption trajectory group membership and self-rated general health and psychological distress reported in 2014, stratified by baseline outcome values

Alcohol consumption trajectory group membershipOR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)P for interaction
Self-rated general health
Good-average at baseline
(n=28 810)
Poor at baseline
(n=1 038)
Stable moderate drinkersReferenceReference
Unstable moderate drinkers1.44 (1.14 to 1.82)1.18 (0.72 to 1.92)0.844
Stable non-drinkers2.30 (1.75 to 3.02)2.33 (1.45 to 3.76)0.059
Unstable non-drinkers1.63 (0.97 to 2.78)1.62 (1.02 to 2.56)0.570
Former drinkers3.08 (2.49 to 3.80)3.54 (1.73 to 7.24)0.030
Stable heavy drinkers2.20 (1.54 to 3.13)1.44 (0.65 to 3.21)0.518
Unstable heavy drinkers1.42 (1.00 to 2.03)1.59 (0.82 to 3.11)0.580
Psychological distress (PS)
No PS at baseline
(n=25 853)
PS at baseline
(n=4155)
Stable moderate drinkersReferenceReference
Unstable moderate drinkers1.11 (0.97 to 1.26)1.04 (0.84 to 1.29)0.564
Stable non-drinkers0.93 (0.76 to 1.13)1.22 (0.91 to 1.64)0.072
Unstable non-drinkers0.85 (0.59 to 1.23)0.93 (0.57 to 1.52)0.613
Former drinkers1.29 (1.11 to 1.49)1.12 (0.89 to 1.43)0.316
Stable heavy drinkers1.16 (0.91 to 1.49)1.38 (0.93 to 2.05)0.356
Unstable heavy drinkers1.04 (0.84 to 1.29)1.19 (0.87 to 1.63)0.373
  • Psychological distress was measured by the General Health Questionnaire-12. All analyses were adjusted for age, gender, marital status, country of birth, current main activity, socioeconomic position, tobacco use, physical activity, fruit consumption and longstanding illness. Logistic regression was used to analyse the association between alcohol consumption trajectories and poor self-rated health and psychological distress reported 2014. Self-rated health was dichotomised as ‘(very)poor’ and ‘(very) good, average’. Psychological distress was defined as a score of ≥4 on the General Health Questionnaire-12.