Table 3

Studies examining cannabis use levels in adolescents before and after legalisation of recreational cannabis use (2016–2018)

StudyPlace of studyType of policy change/study periodParticipant characteristics/nStudy designCannabis use measure (frequency/period)Statistical methods/covariatesKey findingsRisk of bias (/10)(rater 1 (R1); rater 2 (R2))
Estoup et al46Washington.Legalisation in 2012.High school students (14–17) with problematic substance use enrolled in high school in the Seattle area/n=262.Cohort study (2010–2015).3-month use.Mediation model.d=0.061, 95% CI −0.110 to 0.232
(unadjusted).
R1: 7.1.
R2: 7.4.
Average: 7.3.
Possible.
Mason et al47Washington versus other US states.Legalisation in 2012.8th graders (14) in Tacoma, Washington participating in a longitudinal study/n=238.Cohort study (2010/2011–2012/2013).30-day use.Multilevel regression models controlled for substance use initiation prior to baseline.d=0.323, 95% CI −0.177 to 0.825.R1: 9.2.
R2: 9.1.
Average: 9.2.
Low.
Fleming et al48Washington versus other US states.Legalisation in 2012.10th (16) graders participating in the biennial Washington state school survey/n=30 365.Repeated cross-sectional surveys (2000–2014).30-day use.Logistic regression analyses controlled for perceived harm of marijuana, alcohol use and year.d=0.044, 95% CI −0.019 to 0.069.R1: 9.2.
R2: 9.2.
Average: 9.2.
Low.
Cerdá et al50Colorado and Washington versus other US states.Legalisation in 2012.13–18 years participating in the Monitoring the Future surveys (MTF)/n=253 902.Repeated cross-sectional surveys (2010–2015).30-day use.Difference-in-differences.d=1.03, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.06.R1: 9.1.
R2: 10.
Average: 9.6.
Very low.
Kerr et al51Two universities in Oregon versus six in other US states.Legalisation in 2015.18–26 year old college undergraduates participating in the Healthy Minds Study/n=10 924.Repeated cross-sectional surveys (2014 and 2016).30-day use.Mixed-effects logistic regression controlled for cigarette use, year in college, age, sex, race, residential type, relationship status, sexual orientation, international student status, depression, anxiety, adjustment, institution size and survey period.d=0.0139, 95% CI 0.048 to  0.075.R1: 9.5.
R2: 8.5.
Average: 9.
Low.
Miller et al52Washington.Legalisation in 2012; opening of licenced retail stores for marijuana in 2014.College students participating in the National College Health Assessment (WSU NCHA)/n=13 335.Repeated cross-sectional surveys (2005, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2015).30-day use.Logistic regression controlled for age, sex, race, year in school and estimated secular increase in cannabis use.Postmedical marijuana laws (post-MML) (2014): d=0.04, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.083; postrecreational marijuana laws (2015): d=0.082, 95% CI 0.034 to 0.130.R1: 9.5.
R2: 8.5.
Average: 9.
Low.
Harpin et al64Colorado.Legalisation in 2012.6–12th grade (11–17) students (Healthy Kids Colorado Survey)/n=24 171.Repeated cross-sectional survey (2013 and 2014).30-day use.Comparison of prevalence rates.d=0.006, 95% CI −0.026 to 0.038
(unadjusted).
R1: 9.4.
R2: 9.4.
Low.
Jones et al55Colorado.Legalisation in 2012.College students(22–24 years) n=1413.Repeated cross-sectional survey (October 2013, March 2014, October 2014 and March 2015).Lifetime.Comparison of prevalence rates.d=−0.215, 95% CI −0.385 to −0.039 (unadjusted).R1: 4.4.
R2: 5.0.
Average: 4.7.
High.