Table 1

Characteristics of the included studies

Reference, yearCountryStudy designSample size*Percentage of 
women
Age (range/mean±SD)Information on diseases/symptomsSocioeconomic indicatorRespiratory function indices†Relationship between respiratory function and socioeconomic indicators
Ware et al, 198438 USALongitudinal7145n.m.6–9Respiratory symptomsSES Index, parental education and occupationFEV1, FVC
(Dockery et al, 1983 equations)
No association
Goren and Goldsmith, 198629 IsraelCross-sectionaln.m.n.m.Second and fifth gradeRespiratory symptomsCrowding Index, parental educationFVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, PEFPositive association—higher crowding index and lower maternal education was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1/FVC
Kauffmann et al, 198952 FranceCross-sectional1160 (828)486–10n.m.Maternal educationFEV1,FVC, FEF25–75 No association
Azizi and Henry, 199055 MalaysiaCross-sectional121442.17–12Respiratory symptomsPaternal educationFEV1,FVC, FEF25–75 No association
Kitchen et al, 199253 AustraliaLongitudinal223≈508Asthma and respiratory symptomsSocial class (parental occupation), maternal educationVC, FVC, FEV1 Positive association—lower social class was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FVC and FEV1/FVC
Demissie et al, 199633 CanadaCross-sectional989 (916)n.m.5–13n.m.SES Score (parental income, education, occupation)FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVCPositive association—low SES was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1 and FVC, in boys
Lercher and Schmitzberger, 199754 AustriaCross-sectional644n.m.7.5–11n.m.Maternal educationFVC, FEV1, PEF, MEF25, MEF50, MEF75 Positive association—low maternal education was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1
Hancox et al, 200447 New ZealandLongitudinal1037 (980)480–26Asthma and respiratory symptomsSES (parental occupation, education, income), parental incomeFEV1/FVCNo association
Harik-Khan et al, 200434 USACross-sectional75250.98–12HealthyFamily head education, Poverty IndexFEV1, FVC
(Hankinson et al, 1999 equations)
Positive association—poverty in boys and lower parental education in girls was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1, FVC
Raju et al, 200535 IndiaCross-sectional2616405–15HealthySES with Modified 
Kuppuswamy  Scale (parental education and occupation, family income)
FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, PEFRPositive association—lower SES was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by all indices
Balmer et al, 200831 USALongitudinal77556–8.9Cystic fibrosisAdvantage Index (household income, parental education,l social capital)FEV1
(Wang et al, 1993 equations)
Positive association—lower scores in the advantage index was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1
Bennett et al, 200839 USACross-sectional8756.37–18Cystic fibrosisSES (parental education, occupation)FEV1 Positive association—lower SES was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1
Suglia et al, 20089 USACross-sectional313506–7Respiratory symptomsMaternal educationFVC, FEV1, FEF25–75 No association
Trabelsi et al, 200830 TunisiaCross-sectional75648.76–16HealthySES (parental occupation)FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, PEF, MEF50, MMEF25–75 Positive association—lower SES was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by all indices
Tennant et al, 20107 UKLongitudinal25247.214Respiratory symptomsSocial class (paternal occupation), housing conditionsFEV1
(Pistelli et al, 2000 equations)
Positive association—lower social class was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1
Yogev-Baggio et al, 201056 IsraelLongitudinal1181≈559.3±1.6Healthy and respiratory symptomsPaternal education, housing densityChanges in FVC and FEV1 Positive association—lower fathers' education was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1 in healthy children
Menezes et al, 20116 BrazilLongitudinal40055114–15Asthma and respiratory symptomsFamily incomeFEV1, FVCPositive association—lower family income was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1 and FVC, in girls
Slachtova et al, 201132 Multiple‡Cross-sectional24 01048.96–12n.m.Parental educationFEV1, FVC, PEF, MMEFNo association
Wu et al, 201210 TaiwanCross-sectional399449.312.4±0.6n.m.Area-level SES (occupation, income, education)FEV1, FVC, FEF25–75, PEFNegative association—higher SES was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1, FVC, FEF25–75
Taylor-Robinson et al, 201343 UKLongitudinal8055 (5324)47<18Cystic fibrosisIndex of multiple deprivation based on area of residenceFEV1% predictedPositive association—reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1 was found in the most deprived quintile when compared with the least deprived quintile
Rebacz-Maron and Parafiniuk, 201448 TanzaniaCross-sectional255n.m.12.8–24.0n.m.Family material situation, parental educationFEV1, FVCPositive association—lower family material situation was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1 and FVC (<17.5 years)
Siniarska et al, 201449 PolandCross-sectional44450.713–16n.m.SES (parental education, number of rooms, sibling size)VC, FEV1, TV, MV, IRV, ERV, AP, RRNo association
Cogen et al, 201540 USALongitudinal94649.76–12Cystic fibrosisMaternal education, household incomeFEV (Wang et al 1993 and Hankinson et al 1999 equations) No association
Galobardes et al, 201544 UKLongitudinal637849.87–8Asthma and respiratory symptomsParental education and occupation, household income, housing tenureFEV1, FVC, FEF25–75 Positive association—low paternal education was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1
Lum et al, 20158 UKLongitudinal2171 (1901)≈505.2–11.8Asthma and respiratory symptomsReceiving free school meals, family affluence scale, index of multiple deprivation;FEV1, FVC (equations for multiethnic schoolchildren, 2012) No association
Martínez-Briseño et al, 201550 MexicoLongitudinal2641 (1671)n.m.8–17HealthyMonthly family income, parental educationFEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC
(Martínez-Briseño et al 2013 equations)
Positive association—lower income and education was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by all indices
Sanders et al, 201541 USALongitudinal484≈506–7Cystic fibrosisMaternal education, household incomeFEV1
(Wang et al 1993 equations)
Positive association—low maternal education was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1
Cakmak et al, 201651 CanadaCross-sectional2328 (1528)≈509–11Asthma and respiratory symptomsParental education, family incomeFEV1, FVCPositive association—lower education and income was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1, FVC
Lum et al, 201645 UK, IndiaCross-sectional8124 (2549)43.75–17n.m.Socioeconomic circumstancesFEV1, FVC
(GLI equations, 2012)
Positive association—lower SEC was associated with reduced lung function measured by respiratory function z-scores in Hyderabad
Kuti et al, 201736 NigeriaCross-sectional25050.89–17n.m.Overcrowding, socioeconomic class (parental occupation and education)FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC
(Knudson et al 1983 equations)
Positive association—lower social class was associated with reduced lung function measured with FEV1 and FVC in male participants from urban areas
Nowakowski et al, 201737 PolandCross-sectional15210019–24n.m.SES Index (size of dwelling place, number of siblings, parental educationFEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVCPositive association—lower father’s education and SES was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1/FVC
Ong et al, 201742 USALongitudinal1375 (1050)506–13Cystic fibrosisMaternal education, household incomeFEV1
(Wang et al 1993 and Hankinson et al1999 equations)
Positive association—lower education and income was associated with reduced respiratory function measured by FEV1
Saad et al, 201746 UKCross-sectional9052.218–23Asthma and respiratory symptomsSocioeconomic status (parental and grand parental education and occupation)FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC
(NHANES III reference equations)
Positive association—higher maternal education and higher paternal occupation were associated with higher respiratory function measured by FVC.
  • *Total sample size (and the number of participants included in the analysis of lung function indices by SES indicator).

  • †When respiratory function indices were computed using reference equations, it is mentioned in brackets. 

  • ‡Multiple countries: Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, The Czech Republic, Netherlands, Germany, Austria, USA.

  • AP, apnoea; ERV, expiratory reserve volume; FEF, forced expiratory flow; FEV1, forced expiratory volume during first second; FEV1/FVC, ratio between FEV1 and FVC; FVC, forced vital capacity; GLI, Global Lung Function Initiative; IRV, inspiratory reserve volume; MEF, maximal expiratory flow; MMEF, maximum mid-expiratory flow; MV, minute ventilation; n.m., not mentioned; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; PEF, peak expiratory flow; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate; RR, respiration rate per minute; SEC, socioeconomic circumstances; SES, socioeconomic status; TV, tidal volume; VC, vital capacity.