Summary of results for Walking MET scores
| Outcomes | Mean (%) (95% posterior probability interval) |
| Common percent (%) increase in mean non-zero Walking MET score (θ) | Evidence for positive effect 41.7 (40.31, 43.11) |
| Average increase in the probability of observing non-zero Walking MET scores | Evidence for positive effect 25.2 (11.66, 37.37) |
| Effects of covariates |
Direction of evidence
Mean effect (95% posterior probability interval) |
| Effect of age on the mean non-zero Walking MET score (β1) | Evidence for negative effect −0.006 (–0.0067,–0.0059) |
| Effect of age on the probability of observing non-zero Walking MET scores (β1*) | Unclear evidence for effect −0.01 (-0.032, 0.0091) |
| Effect of gender* on the mean non-zero Walking MET score (β2) | Evidence for positive effect 0.38 (0.37, 0.39) |
| Effect of gender* on the probability of observing non-zero Walking MET scores (β2*) | Unclear evidence for effect 0.15 (–0.54, 0.84) |
| Effect of working status† on the mean non-zero Walking MET score (β3) | Evidence for negative effect −0.11 (–0.12,–0.097) |
| Effect of working status† on the probability of observing non-zero Walking MET scores (β3*) | Unclear evidence for effect −0.75 (–1.60, 0.058) |
↵*The gender component is the incremental effect of being male on the mean non-zero MET scores and corresponding probabilities of non-zero MET scores.
↵†The working status component is the incremental effect of working on the mean non-zero MET scores and corresponding probabilities of non-zero MET scores.
MET, metabolic equivalent.