Table 2

Characteristics of trauma cases at rural hospitals and urban TCs

CharacteristicsRural EDs
n=3388
Transfers*
n=3827
P value†Urban TCs
n=72 742
P value‡
Demographics§
 Age, mean (SD)63.3 (24.6)50.0 (24.4)<0.00159.1 (26.3)<0.001
 Male, n (%)1624 (48)2322 (61)<0.00135 031 (48)0.80
 ISS, n (%)
  1–92823 (83)2907 (76)<0.00156 815 (78)<0.001
  10–15229 (7)281 (7)0.3357635 (11)<0.001
  16–24227 (7)312 (8)0.0194659 (6)0.496
  ≥25109 (3)327 (9)<0.0013633 (5)<0.001
 Injury mechanism, n (%)
  Fall2252 (66)2113 (55)<0.00150 462 (69)<0.001
  MVC628 (19)971 (25)<0.00110 812 (15)<0.001
  Other508 (15)743 (20)<0.00111 468 (16)0.23
 Scene of injury, n (%)
  Home1616 (47)645 (17)<0.00122 550 (31)<0.001
  Street/Road497 (15)624 (16)0.0611 908 (16)0.009
  Other1275 (38)2558 (67)<0.00138 284 (53)<0.001
 Injury type¶, n (%)
  Head643 (19)661 (17)12 188 (17)
  Face321 (9)534 (14)9187 (13)
  Neck37 (1)40 (1)977 (1)
  Thorax709 (21)430 (11)10 586 (15)
  Abdominal195 (6)198 (5)4260 (6)
  Spinal521 (15)449 (12)7906 (11)
  Upper limb784 (23)1182 (31)21 659 (30)
  Lower limb1355 (40)2069 (54)40 032 (55)
  Presence of craniocerebral trauma345 (10)437 (11)7977 (11)
  Undetermined176 (5)104 (3)2146 (3)
 Transport, n (%)
  Ambulance2524 (74)1749 (46)<0.00154 745 (75)0.32
  Air1 (<1)5 (<1)0.223761 (<1)0.984
  Other424 (13)252 (6)<0.0012757 (4)<0.001
  Unknown439 (13)1821 (48)<0.00115 179 (21)<0.001
  • *Patients transferred from rural EDs to urban TCs.

  • †Significance for difference in characteristics between trauma patients admitted to rural EDs and trauma patients transferred from rural EDs to urban centres.

  • ‡Significance for difference in characteristics between trauma patients admitted to rural EDs and trauma patients transported directly to urban centres.

  • §Data were unavailable for 258 patients.

  • ¶Some patients had >1 injury type.

  • ED, emergency department; ISS, Injury Severity Score; MVC, motor vehicle collision; TC, trauma centre.