Table 5

Association between HCY, B12, FA and ED along with the increased levels of these indexes

UnadjustedAge adjustedMultivariate adjusted
OR95% CIP valueOR95% CIP valueOR95% CIP value
 Q21.1300.838 to 1.5250.4221.0220.753 to 1.3870.8871.0120.744 to 1.3770.938
 Q31.2920.958 to 1.7430.0941.1870.875 to 1.6100.2711.2100.890 to 1.6460.224
 Q41.2760.946 to 1.7200.1101.0910.803 to 1.4830.5781.1030.810 to 1.5020.534
 Q20.9170.680 to 1.2360.5690.8930.659 to 1.2090.4640.8990.662 to 1.2210.496
 Q30.9880.733 to 1.3330.9390.9720.717 to 1.3160.8530.9860.726 to 1.3380.927
 Q41.4521.076 to 1.9610.0151.2990.955 to 1.7650.0951.2860.945 to 1.7520.110
 Q21.3130.974 to 1.7700.0741.3250.978 to 1.7950.0691.3320.981 to 1.8110.067
 Q31.3000.963 to 1.7550.0861.2430.916 to 1.6870.1631.2860.944 to 1.7510.111
 Q41.1980.888 to 1.6160.2361.0940.806 to 1.4870.5641.1160.819 to 1.5220.487
  • In the multinomial logistic regression, the levels of HCY, B12 and FA were divided into quartiles (Q1<25%, 25%≤Q2≤50%, 50%<Q3≤75%, Q4>75%), which were treated as the categorical dependent variables. Q1 was the reference. As a binary categorical variable, the ED was put as the ‘Factors’. Multivariate adjusted: age, BMI, WHR, smoke and drink.

  • BMI, body mass index; B12, vitamin B12; ED, erectile dysfunction; FA, folic acid; HCY, homocysteine; WHR, waist:hip ratio.