Table 6

Strategy uptake in included studies*

Author, yearIntervention/sReceived recruitment intervention, nRandomised to host RCT, n (%)Statistical testingStatistically significant?
Recruitment stage: Identification of participants
 Bhar et al, 201338 Referrals from co-investigator’s Veteran’s Affairs mental health clinic6324 (38)
Referrals from psychiatric outpatient clinic183 (17)
Mass mailing to primary care patients mailing list8696 (1)
Referrals from inpatient psychiatric unit50 (0)
Referrals from primary care physicians00 (N/A)NRNR
 Chlebowski et al, 201040 Mass mailing to male home owners60 000600 (1)
Mass mailing to spouses of previous female research participants80034 (4)NRNR
 Heiney et al, 201042 Referral by physician2413 (54)
Referral from previous health research study20611 (5)
Mass mailing to oncology clinic list138415 (1)
Mass mailing to urology clinic list7598 (1)
Mass mailing to support services department list3502 (1)
Posters, newspaper articles, otherNR10 (N/A)NRNR
 Lee et al, 201145 Mass mailing by post to former trial participants, health system users and commercial direct mailing lists34 064143 (0.4)
Newspaper, radio and online advertisingNR129 (N/A)
Mass mailing by email to university employees, physicians, database of people interested in research35 00031 (0.1)
Referral from urology clinic6330 (48)
Posters and flyersNR8 (N/A)
OtherNR28 (N/A)NRNR
Recruitment stage: Participant information and consent
 Donovan et al, 200235 Before: Not specified30NR (30–40)
After: Recruitment training and documentation informed by qualitative research155108 (70)NRNR
 Donovan et al, 200349 Recruitment visit conducted by urologist7553 (71)
Recruitment visit conducted by nurse7550 (67)RD=4% (95% CI −10.8% to +18.8% p=0.60)No
 Donovan et al, 200936 Before: Standard recruitment training and documentationNRNR (69)
After: Recruitment training and documentation informed by qualitative researchNRNR (65)NRNR
Before: No site reviewCentre A: 24
Centre B: 46
Centre A: 11 (45)
Centre B: 23 (50)
After: Recruitment-focused site review triggered by low performanceCentre A: 14
Centre B: 40
Centre A: 12 (86)
Centre B: 31 (78)
Centre A: p=0.020
Centre B: p=0.013
Yes
 Eccles et al, 201334 Standard study information at recruitment visit153 (20)
Decision aid video at recruitment visit151 (7)NRNR
 Wallace et al, 200650 Before: one-on-one information session270 (0)
After: Multidisciplinary group information session26332 (12)NRNR
Recruitment stage: Multiple stages (Identification of participants, assessment of eligibility, participant information and consent)
 Ford et al, 200451 Arm A: Enhanced mailed invitation, telephone screening by African-American interviewer, collection of baseline data by mail307978 (3)Arm A v Arm D: p<0.01Yes
Arm B: Enhanced mailed invitation, telephone screening by African-American interviewer, collection of baseline data by phone307587 (3)
Arm C: Enhanced mailed invitation, telephone screening by African-American interviewer, collection of baseline data in person at church project session2949116 (4)
Arm D (control): Standard mailed invitation, telephone screening by African-American or Caucasian interviewer, collection of baseline data by mail329795 (3)Difference between arms B, C and D: p=0.66No
  • *Strategy uptake defined as the percentage of people receiving the recruitment intervention who went on to be randomised to the host RCT. Studies that did not report the number of participants receiving the recruitment intervention excluded. Poor quality studies excluded.

  • NR , not reported; RCT, randomised controlled trial; N/A, not applicable.