Table 1

Summary of study characteristics of included studies addressing the test accuracy question of FC testing in the detection of IBD

Study characteristicOutcome
Study characteristics:
Publication type (studies)
  Full text32
  Abstract6
 Year of publication (range)2000–2018
 Population size (range)31–1031
Geographical region (studies):
 UK14
 Rest of Europe16
 Asia2
 Middle East2
 North Africa1
 Russia1
 Canada1
 USA1
Patient characteristics:
 Age (range)14–97 years
 IBD prevalence (range)2.1%–76%
FC assay type (studies)*:
 Immunoassays
  ELISA32
  FEIA5
  CLIA3
  PETIA2
 POCT10
Setting (studies)†
 Primary care5
 Secondary care29
  Outpatients and inpatients12
  Referred patients17
 Mix2
Target condition (studies)*:
 IBD23
 Inflammatory disease5
 Organic disease19
Non-target condition (studies)*:
 IBS12
 Functional disease2
 Non-IBD12
 Non-organic disease16
 Non-inflammatory disease5
 Other3
FC test data collection (studies):
 Prospectively for patients with eligible symptoms in primary care1
 Prospectively for patients at time of referral in primary care1
 Retrospectively of routine FC tests in primary or secondary care10
 Prospectively prior to a planned colonoscopy in secondary care23
 Prospectively during the assessment for the need of colonoscopy in secondary care1
 Unclear2
Reference standard (studies):
 Colonoscopy with biopsy13
 Colonoscopy±biopsy7
 Endoscopy+other imaging tests8
 Endoscopy+follow-up3
 Endoscopy+other imaging tests+follow-up5
 Unclear2
  • *Some studies evaluated multiple tests/clinical questions.

  • †Two studies were unclear about the setting.

  • CLIA, chemiluminescent immunoassay; FC, faecal calprotectin; FEIA, fluorescence enzyme immunoassay; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; PETIA, particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay; POCT, point-of-care test.