Table 3

Secondary objectives: satisfaction, adherence, and patient and doctor behaviours (ITT analysis)

(A) SatisfactionControl group without PILs (n=156)Intervention group with PILs (n=168)OR (95% CI)P value
1. Satisfaction with infrastructure (reception, food, waiting time)92/156 (59%)91/168 (54.2%)0.82 (0.53 to 1.28)0.38
2. Satisfaction with nurses and care assistants112/156 (71.8%)137/168 (81.6%)1.74 (1.03 to 2.93) 0.04
3. Satisfaction with the doctor103/156 (66%)131/168 (78%)1.82 (1.11 to 2.98) 0.016
4. Satisfaction with the medical consultation93/156 (59.6%)129/168 (76.8%)2.24 (1.39 to 3.62) <0.0.01
5. Would you recommend the ED to friends or family?119/156 (76.3%)135/168 (80.4%)1.27 (0.75 to 2.16)0.37
Total satisfaction score 19 (16–20)19 (17–20)0.20
(B) Adherence* (according to doctors’ behaviours)Control group without PILsIntervention group with PILsOR (95% CI)P value
1. Have you taken the whole course of the prescribed treatment?108/134 (80.6%)107/130 (82%)1.12 (0.60 to 2.09) 0.72
2. Did you respect the prescribed doses?127/134 (94.8%)122/124 (98.4%)3.36 (0.68 to 16.5) 0.18
3. Did you comply with the regimen and conditions (time at which you should take the medication, if you were fasted or not, during meals and so on)?113/134 (84.3%)116/124 (93.5%)2.69 (1.15 to 6.33)  0.02
4. Did you have additional examinations or a specialised consultation prescribed by your doctor (imagery, laboratory analyses, an appointment with a specialist)?87/98 (88.8%)119/141 (84.4%)0.68 (0.32 to 1.48) 0.34
5. Did you follow the recommendations and the advice given (have you changed any habits as a result of the consultation)?82/89 (92.1%)104/123 (84.6%)0.47 (0.19 to 1.17) 0.10
6. Did you follow health monitoring instructions and advice given by your doctor on if and when to reconsult a healthcare professional?75/78 (96.2%)81/83 (97.6%)1.62 (0.26 to 9.96) 0.67
Total adherence score 0.93 (0.80–1) (n=154)0.89 (0.76–0.97) (n=165) 0.21
(C) Patient behavioursControl group without PILsIntervention group with PILsOR (95% CI)P value
1. Did you need a new medical consultation for the same condition?50/156 (32.1%)30/168 (17.9%)0.46 (0.27 to 0.77) <0.01
2.1. Did you consult an ED physician?42/156 (26.9%)14/168 (8.3%)0.25 (0.13 to 0.47) <0.01
2.2. Did you consult your primary care physician?11/156 (7.1%)17/168 (10.1%)1.48 (0.67 to 2.28)0.32
(D) Doctor behaviours
1. Drug prescriptions?134/156 (85.9%)130/168 (77.4%)0.56 (0.32 to 1.00) 0.049
2. Prescriptions of further tests (laboratory analysis, imaging, appointment with specialists)?98/156 (62.8%)141/168 (83.9%)3.09 (1.83 to 5.22) <0.01
3. Given advice to follow?89/155 (57.4%)123/168 (73.2%)2.03 (1.27 to 3.23) <0.01
4. Information on if and when to consult a doctor again?79/155 (51.0%)84/165 (50.9%)1.00 (0.64 to 1.55)0.99
  • *Two patients in phase 1 (control) and three patients in phase 2 (with PILs) did not receive any prescription and were not included in the adherence analysis.

  • P values in bold were considered statistically significant (p<0.05).

  • There were no significant differences in overall satisfaction and adherence scores across the entire population (intention-to-treat). All three satisfaction items related to healthcare professionals and for adherence, the item related to timing of medication intake, were significantly improved. The overall satisfaction score significantly improved on per-protocol analysis. Table 4 shows the answers to questions concerning the PIL in the intervention group.

  • ED, emergency department; ITT, intention-to-treat; PILs, patient information leaflets.