Table 2

Ten-point, methodological assessment scale of studies

Author (year)Training sampleEvaluation of interventionTotal score
Number of trainees >30?Training cohort sufficient detail representative of target training population?Sufficient detail given for selection of training sample?A control cohort?Random assignment to a cohort?Selection of evaluation sample clearly described?A preintervention assessment of outcome measures done?Is evaluation fully reported and representative of training sample?Is there masked  evaluationLong-term postevaluation (≥1  month) of  outcomes?
1Abas et al (2016)  10000000012
2Abayomi (2012)11100110005
3Adebowale et al (2015)10100111005
4Alonso et al (2014)00000000011
5Armstrong et al (2010)10111111108
6Armstrong et al (2011)11000111016
7Bowers et al (2009)01000110003
8Chew-Graham et al (2014)11000100003
9Chibanda et al (2016)111111111110
10Church et al (2010)10000110014
11Cook (2017)11100101005
12Ekers et al (2013)01000101003
13Ferraz et al (2009)10100110015
14Hofmann-Braussard (2017)11111111109
15Hossain et al (2010)10100100014
16Jenkins et al (2013)11111101119
17Jordans et al (2012)11100111017
18Kauye et al (2014)01111111108
19Lam et al (2016)10000111004
20Li et al (2014)11100111006
21MacCarthy et al (2013)11000101015
22Morawska et al (2012)11100111017
23Paudel et al (2014)00000100001
24Ravitz et al (2013)11100111006
25Ruud et al (2016)10000000012
26Sadik et al (2011)11010111107
27Siriwardhana et al (2016)00100111004
28Usher et al (2015)00100111004
29Wright et al (2014)11100111017
TOTAL 22 17 17 6 5 26 19 19 6 13 150